Skip to content

Esketamine Preserves Network Connectivity and Promotes Recovery in Consciousness Disorders.

Xuewei Qin, Xuanling Chen, Lan Yao, Bo Wang, Hongchuan Niu, Zhenhu Liang, Zhibin Zhao, Jian Wang, Jiapeng Huang, Xiangyang Guo, Xiaoli Li

CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics May 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1002/cns.70890 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Prospective, non-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 34
Population Adult patients with disorders of consciousness undergoing spinal cord stimulator implantation
Interventions Esketamine Propofol
Duration 3-month follow-up
Topics Esketamine
Key findings Esketamine was associated with better preservation of neural complexity and gamma-band connectivity, faster respiratory recovery, and improved consciousness outcomes at 3 months compared to propofol.

Abstract

Background: Disorders of consciousness (DoC) present significant therapeutic challenges with limited effective interventions. The choice of anesthetic agent during procedures such as spinal cord stimulation may influence long-term neurological outcomes, yet comparative evidence is scarce. This prospective, non-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial investigated the neurophysiological and clinical effects of esketamine versus propofol in patients with DoC.

Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized trial, 34 adult DoC patients undergoing spinal cord stimulator implantation were allocated to receive either esketamine (n = 17) or propofol (n = 17) as the primary anesthetic, based on clinical practice. Multimodal assessments included the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) at baseline and 3-month follow-up, along with high-density electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze permutation entropy (PE) and weighted phase lag index (wPLI). Multivariable regression adjusted for key confounders.

Results: Compared to propofol, esketamine was associated with significantly faster recovery of spontaneous respiration (12.02 ± 3.88 vs. 17.42 ± 4.62 min, p = 0.005) and reduced need for intraoperative vasopressors (17.65% vs. 52.94%, p = 0.034). EEG analysis revealed that esketamine better preserved brain electrical complexity (higher permutation entropy during maintenance, p < 0.001) and maintained higher functional connectivity, particularly in the gamma band (weighted phase lag index, p = 0.054).

Conclusion: Esketamine demonstrates superior neurophysiological preservation over propofol in patients with disorders of consciousness, maintaining neural complexity and gamma-band connectivity during anesthesia. These mechanisms are associated with accelerated respiratory recovery, hemodynamic stability, and significantly improved consciousness outcomes at 3 months, supporting its potential as a neuroprotective anesthetic in this population.

Comparable studies

Other non-randomized and open-label trials on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults (≥ 18 years) with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term study n = 802
Long-Term Safety and Maintenance of Response With Esketamine Nasal Spray in Participants With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Interim Results of the SUSTAIN-3 Study Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Open-label, long-term extension study n = 1,148
Safety and efficacy with esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: long-term extension study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression who participated in ≥1 of 6 phase 3 parent... 2025 Open-label, single-arm long-term extension study n = 1,148
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression and Comorbid Chronic Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Open-Label Single-Arm Pilot Study Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and comorbid post-traumatic... 2022 Open-label, single-arm, retrospective pilot study n = 11
Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data Patients with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Post-hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term study n = 778

Citations in the library

Explore topics