Skip to content

Assessing novel expectancies about ayahuasca : a preliminary report

Brianna R. Altman

2019 DOI: 10.54014/57py-y18d (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional survey
Sample size 139
Population Experienced users of ayahuasca and other hallucinogens
Topics Ayahuasca
Keywords Anthropology
Key findings Positive connections to nature and others increased the likelihood of using ayahuasca again, while aversive physical reactions decreased that likelihood.

Abstract

Given the growing popularity of Ayahuasca, we sought to identify why people might use this psychoactive brew rather than classic hallucinogens like LSD or psilocybin. Experienced users (N=139) completed an online survey about their use of hallucinogens, including ayahuasca, how their ayahuasca experiences differed from those with other hallucinogens, and their willingness to use ayahuasca over other hallucinogens in the future. Participants reported meaningful differences between ayahuasca and other hallucinogens, which apparently related to positive connections to nature and other people, dramatic or terrifying negative thoughts, and aversive physical reactions. Multiple measures of self-reported likelihood of using ayahuasca again increased as positive connections increased but decreased as aversive physical reactions increased. A global score of items from the scale significantly covaried with individuals’ likelihood of using ayahuasca over other hallucinogens. These findings suggest unique qualities of ayahuasca and its effects compared to other hallucinogens, which might impact an individual’s willingness to try the substance again. Future studies might expand upon this finding by exploring individual factors that may impact ayahuasca experiences and likelihood of future use. Comparable approaches could also identify unique aspects of other hallucinogens to see if those attributes help predict a preference of one over others.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on ayahuasca, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Survey of subjective "God encounter experiences": Comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT Adults reporting a single most memorable God encounter experience, either nondrug or... 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 4,285
Adverse effects of ayahuasca: Results from the Global Ayahuasca Survey. Ayahuasca users from more than 50 countries who completed an online survey 2022 Cross-sectional survey n = 10,836
Ayahuasca in adolescence: a preliminary psychiatric assessment. Adolescents from a Brazilian ayahuasca sect and matched controls 2005 Controlled cross-sectional study n = 80
Psychological and neuropsychological assessment of regular hoasca users. Regular hoasca users from a U.S. branch of União do Vegetal and matched non-user controls 2016 Cross-sectional study n = 57
Indoleamine Hallucinogens in Cluster Headache: Results of the Clusterbusters Medication Use Survey People with cluster headache 2015 Cross-sectional survey n = 496

Citations in the library

Explore topics