A phase 1 study of a second experience with Group Retreat Psilocybin Therapy for partial responders after a first experience
Anthony L. Back, Bonnie A. Mcgregor, Leslie L. Thorn, Kalin Harvey, Dianna Blom, George Callan, John Guy, Sameet Kumar, Rob Hershberg, Melissa Layer, Jackie Levin, Susanna Myers, Juliana Pérez, Kathy Salmonson, Peter Thompson, Joseph Whinney
Frontiers in Public Health April 14, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1810904 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Single-arm Phase 1 study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 13 |
| Population | Patients with metastatic cancer who were partial responders to prior group retreat psilocybin therapy |
| Intervention | Group Retreat Psilocybin Therapy |
| Dose | 35 mg initial dose, optional 10 mg booster |
| Duration | Single dosing day, 24-week follow-up |
| Topics | Psilocybin |
| Key points | A second experience of group retreat psilocybin therapy with a higher dose and optional booster was safe, feasible, and associated with enhanced mystical experiences and sustained improvements in anxiety and depression among partial responders. |
Abstract
Introduction: Psilocybin therapy has demonstrated efficacy for cancer-related anxiety and depression, but resource-intensive individual treatment models raise important questions for psychedelic public health about equitable access and scalability. In our prior Phase 1/2 study of group retreat psilocybin therapy for patients with metastatic cancer, we observed partial responders who did not achieve full therapeutic benefit. No published research has examined whether partial responders might benefit from a second psilocybin therapy experience.
Methods: We conducted a single-arm Phase 1 study to assess the safety of a second experience of Group Retreat Psilocybin Therapy for partial responders from our prior study. Protocol modifications addressed dose as a potential contributor to partial response: the initial dose was increased to 35 mg, and an optional 10 mg booster could be requested by participants who reported low subjective effect at 60-90 min and passed a safety check. Pre-retreat antidepressant tapering was not required. The intervention was delivered in a group retreat format with four primary facilitators and included three preparation sessions, a single psilocybin dosing day, and four integration sessions.
Results: = 1). Seven participants (54%) received the booster dose. Mean Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total scores decreased from 15.08 (SD 4.35) at baseline to 9.00 (SD 4.62) at Day +8, with improvements maintained through 24-week follow-up (mean 10.42, SD 6.93); 69% achieved HADS scores below the clinical threshold. The proportion of participants with a "complete" mystical experience (Mystical Experience Questionnaire ≥ 60%) increased from 38% in the first experience to 77% in the second, without an increase in challenging experiences (Challenging Experiences Questionnaire). Social support, social identification, and group cohesion scores showed progressive improvements that persisted at 24 weeks.
Discussion: A second experience of group retreat psilocybin therapy was safe and feasible for partial responders with metastatic cancer. The protocol modifications-higher dose, optional booster, and no antidepressant tapering requirement-did not introduce new safety concerns and were associated with substantially enhanced mystical experiences and preliminary efficacy signals. These findings support further investigation of retreatment protocols for partial responders and contribute to developing scalable group-based models relevant to psychedelic public health, where the resource intensity of individual treatment remains a fundamental barrier to population-level access.
Comparable studies
Other non-randomized and open-label trials on psilocybin, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Patients with moderate-to-severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression | 2016 | Open-label feasibility trial | n = 12 |
| Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Patients with severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression | 2017 | Open-label trial | n = 20 |
| Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction Psychiatrically healthy nicotine-dependent smokers | 2014 | Open-label pilot study | n = 15 |
| Quality of Acute Psychedelic Experience Predicts Therapeutic Efficacy of Psilocybin for Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients with treatment-resistant depression | 2018 | Clinical trial | n = 20 |
| Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Psilocybin in 9 Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) | 2006 | Controlled clinical trial |
Citations in the library
Cites 13
- Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial Journal of Psychopharmacology November 30, 2016
- Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial Journal of Psychopharmacology November 30, 2016
- Validation of the revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire in experimental sessions with psilocybin Journal of Psychopharmacology October 6, 2015
- Emotional breakthrough and psychedelics: Validation of the Emotional Breakthrough Inventory. Journal of Psychopharmacology July 11, 2019
- The Challenging Experience Questionnaire: Characterization of challenging experiences with psilocybin mushrooms Journal of Psychopharmacology November 18, 2016
and 8 more in the library