Skip to content

An Exploration of the History and Controversies Surrounding MDMA and MDA

Alana Rae. Pentney

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs September 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2001.10400568 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics MDMA
Keywords Reputation Enforcement Pharmacology Criminology
Citations 94
Key findings The history of MDA and MDMA suggests they have potential for safe psychotherapeutic use, and their legal status may be worth reconsidering.

Abstract

In existence for nearly a century, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy") have gained quite a reputation. Perceived by some as dangerous neurotoxins, and by others as potential psychotherapeutics, these compounds have become a center of controversy among academics and law enforcement officials, and in the process have gained extensive media exposure. The classification of these drugs as illicit, controlled substances in the United States has not prevented their use, and MDMA, or Ecstasy, is currently one of the most popular substances used recreationally in North America. The scheduling of MDMA and MDA has, however, led to the distribution of contaminated, or falsely represented, Ecstasy tablets, and prevented responsible research into the detrimental and therapeutic effects of these drugs. A look at the history of these compounds suggests that they have the potential to be used safely as psychotherapeutic tools, and that the legal status of MDMA and MDA may be worth reconsidering.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on MDMA, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics