Cost-effectiveness of psilocybin-assisted therapy for severe depression: exploratory findings from a decision analytic model.
Paul McCrone, Henry Fisher, Clare Knight, Rebecca Harding, Anne K. Schlag, David Nutt, Joanna C. Neill
Psychological Medicine December 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723001411 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPsilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) may be a cost-effective treatment for severe depression, depending on the price of the drug and the level of therapist support. A decision model compared PAP with conventional medication, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and their combination over six months. PAP produced the highest quality-adjusted life years (0.310) but also the highest expected healthcare cost (£6,132 to £7,652). PAP became cost-effective when therapist support costs were reduced by 50% and the psilocybin price dropped to £400–£800 per person. From a societal perspective, PAP's cost-effectiveness improved further. More long-term outcome data are needed.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Decision model (cost-effectiveness analysis) Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Patients with difficult-to-treat or severe depression |
| Interventions | Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy conventional medication cognitive behavioural therapy |
| Duration | 6-month time period |
| Topics | Psilocybin Psychedelic-assisted therapy |
| Keywords | Decision analysis Treatment-resistant depression trd Pap |
| Citations | 34 |
| Key finding | Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy has the potential to be cost-effective for severe depression, but its cost-effectiveness depends on reducing the price of psilocybin and the level of therapist support. |
Abstract
There is growing evidence to support the use of the psychedelic drug psilocybin for difficult-to-treat depression. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) with conventional medication, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), and the combination of conventional medication and CBT. A decision model simulated patient events (response, remission, and relapse) following treatment. Data on probabilities, costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived from previous studies or from best estimates. Expected healthcare and societal costs and QALYs over a 6-month time period were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were used to address uncertainty in parameter estimates. The expected healthcare cost of PAP varied from £6132 to £7652 depending on the price of psilocybin. This compares to £3528 for conventional medication alone, £4250 for CBT alone, and £4197 for their combination. QALYs were highest for psilocybin (0.310), followed by CBT alone (0.283), conventional medication alone (0.278), and their combination (0.287). Psilocybin was shown to be cost-effective compared to the other therapies when the cost of therapist support was reduced by 50% and the psilocybin price was reduced from its initial value to £400 to £800 per person. From a societal perspective, psilocybin had improved cost-effectiveness compared to a healthcare perspective. Psilocybin has the potential to be a cost-effective therapy for severe depression. This depends on the level of psychological support that is given to patients receiving psilocybin and the price of the drug itself. Further data on long-term outcomes are required to improve the evidence base.