Prevalence of Novel Psychoactive Substance (NPS) Use in Patients Admitted to Drug Detoxification Treatment
Michael Specka, Thomas Kuhlmann, Jürgen Sawazki, Udo Bonnet, Renate Steinert, Monika Cybulska-Rycicki, Helmut Eich, Benita Zeiske, Antje Niedersteberg, Luzia Schaaf, Norbert Scherbaum
Frontiers in Psychiatry July 7, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00569 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Multicenter cross-sectional study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 295 |
| Population | Patients admitted to in-patient detoxification treatment for illicit drugs in Germany |
| Topics | Cannabis MDMA Psilocybin |
| Keywords | Synthetic cannabinoids Heroin Detoxification alternative medicine Designer drug Psychoactive substance Hallucinogen Recreational drug Illicit drug Mephedrone Psychoactive drug Substance abuse |
| Citations | 42 |
| Key findings | Patients in detoxification treatment showed multiple substance use but rarely used novel psychoactive substances, while unprescribed pregabalin use was common. |
Abstract
Background: About 15 years ago, a diverse group of new recreational psychotropic substances began to emerge, which were marketed for example as “legal highs,” “research chemicals,” or “designer drugs.” These substances were later subsumed under the label “Novel Psychoactive Substances” (NPS). Important NPS classes are cathinones, synthetic cannabimimetics, phenethylamines, and herbal drugs. The health care system for psychotropic substance use disorders (SUDs) traditionally focused on a few substances, such as alcohol, heroin, cocaine, amphetamines, or cannabis. Users of illicit substances often engage in polydrug use. However little is known about the prevalence of NPS use within the group of “classical” illicit substance users.
Objective: We investigated lifetime and recent use of NPS and other drugs in patients who underwent in-patient detoxification treatment from illicit drugs in Germany.
Methods: In a multicenter study with eight participating facilities, patients admitted to treatment underwent a standardized interview at admission, concerning their past and current substance use. The interview comprised classical substances of abuse, NPS, and rarely used substances such as LSD. In addition, participating sites had the opportunity to analyze their patients’ routine drug screenings by means of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), which permitted detection of NPS.
Results: Interviews from 295 patients could be analyzed. Most patients were opiate dependent and multiple substance users. About 32% reported use of synthetic cannabimimetics during lifetime, but usually only a few times. An important reason for their use was that NPS were not detected by drug testing in prisons or drug treatment facilities. Cathinones, herbal drugs or other NPS had rarely been used during lifetime. NPS use during the last 30 days before admission was nearly zero. This was confirmed by urine analysis results. In contrast, lifetime and current use of opiates, alcohol, cocaine, benzodiazepines, and cannabis was high. In addition, 18% reported of regular unprescribed pregabalin use during lifetime, and 20% had recently used pregabalin.
Conclusion: Patients admitted to drug detoxification treatment showed multiple substance use, but this did not include NPS use. The diversion of legal medications such as pregabalin in this group is a serious concern.
Comparable studies
Other cross-sectional and survey studies on cannabis, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabis use before age 15 and subsequent executive functioning 104 chronic cannabis users (49 early-onset before age 15, 55 late-onset after age 15)... | 2011 | Observational cross-sectional study | n = 148 |
| Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students Drug-using university students | 2006 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 149 |
| Persisting Reductions in Cannabis, Opioid, and Stimulant Misuse After Naturalistic Psychedelic Use: An Online Survey Online survey respondents | 2020 | Cross-sectional survey | |
| User perceptions of the benefits and harms of hallucinogenic drug use: A web-based questionnaire study Users of hallucinogenic drugs who completed a web-based questionnaire | 2010 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 600 |
| Illicit Use of LSD or Psilocybin, but not MDMA or Nonpsychedelic Drugs, is Associated with Mystical Experiences in a Dose-Dependent Manner Adults recruited from the MAPS website and newsletter, most reporting use of various... | 2012 | Cross-sectional survey | n = 337 |
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
Cites 3
- Self-reported use of novel psychoactive substances among attendees of electronic dance music venues. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse November 1, 2016
- New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) – a Challenge for the Addiction Treatment Services Pharmacopsychiatry April 25, 2017
- Presentations due to acute toxicity of psychoactive substances in an urban emergency department in Switzerland: a case series. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology May 26, 2016