Funding Success of United States Federal Grant Applications Proposing to Study Therapeutic Applications of Psychedelics: A Survey Study
Psychoactives February 5, 2025 DOI: 10.3390/psychoactives4010004 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 10 |
| Population | Corresponding authors of the 50 most-cited psychedelic research articles published after 2000 and Twitter respondents |
| Keywords | Survey research Library science Public administration |
| Citations | 7 |
| Key findings | Only 16.7% of NIH grant applications for therapeutic psychedelic research were funded, below the NIH's average rate, though the post-2006 funding rate aligns with the NIH's annual average. |
Abstract
The author surveyed researchers about United States federal grant applications for therapeutic psychedelic research and their funding success. An anonymous survey was sent to corresponding authors of the 50 most-cited psychedelic research articles published after 2000 and also disseminated on Twitter. Ten researchers responded, reporting on 24 National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant applications for psilocybin, ibogaine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and other psychedelics, dating back to the early 1990s. Grant applications increased noticeably after 2006. Of the applications assessed, 16.7% were funded, below the NIH’s 23.4% average funding rate for R01-equivalent grants from 1998 to 2023. While no applications submitted before 2006–2010 were funded, the funding rate since then (19.05–22.2%) aligns with the NIH’s 20.6 ± 1.9% annual average for R01-equivalent grants from 2006 to 2023. Respondents generally perceived funding for psychedelic research as more difficult to obtain than for other areas, though recent improvements were noted. If the analyzed applications represent only a small subset of total submissions of applications proposing to study therapeutic applications of psychedelics, the findings may have limited generalizability and larger-scale validation studies would be required. However, this is difficult to determine since detailed data on unfunded NIH applications are not publicly available.
Citations in the library
Cited by 7
- A Scoping Review of Research in Naturalistic Studies with Psychedelics. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs June 28, 2025
- With great power comes great responsibility: Promise and caution in the new psychedelic renaissance Brain Disorders September 23, 2025
- Naturalistic use of psychedelics is associated with longitudinal improvements in anxiety and depression during global crisis times. Journal of Psychopharmacology June 18, 2025
- Becoming a Psychedelic User: Reflections on Howard Becker and the (Future) Sociology of Psychedelics Sociology Compass August 1, 2025
- Attitudes of Mental Healthcare Professionals Towards the Use of Psychedelics in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review Journal of Psychoactive Drugs June 17, 2026
and 2 more in the library
Cites 7
- Global Street Food: la cocina de la calle Diseño interior 2009
- Human psychopharmacology of N,N-dimethyltryptamine Behavioural Brain Research December 1, 1995
- Efficacy and Enlightenment: LSD Psychotherapy and the Drug Amendments of 1962 Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences August 16, 2012
- United States National Institutes of Health grant funding for psychedelic-assisted therapy clinical trials from 2006-2020. International Journal of Drug Policy 2022
- Practical considerations in the establishment of psychedelic research programs. Psychopharmacology 2025
and 2 more in the library