Skip to content

Post-acute psychological effects of classical serotonergic psychedelics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Simon B. Goldberg, Benjamin Shechet, Christopher R. Nicholas, Chi Wing Ng, Geetanjali Deole, Zhuofan Chen, Charles L. Raison

Psychological Medicine November 4, 2020 DOI: 10.1017/s003329172000389x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Placebo-controlled Peer reviewed
Sample size 549
Population Clinical and non-clinical samples from experimental studies administering psilocybin, ayahuasca, or LSD
Interventions Psilocybin Ayahuasca Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)
Duration Mean longest follow-up = 55.34 weeks
Topics Ayahuasca Psilocybin Serotonin
Keywords Hallucinogen Meta-analysis Clinical psychology Adverse effect Moderation Placebo Randomized controlled trial
Citations 66
Key findings Classical psychedelics show large, significant post-acute effects on psychiatric symptoms, affect, social outcomes, and existential/spiritual outcomes, but not on personality traits or mindfulness.

Abstract

Abstract Background Scientific interest in the therapeutic effects of classical psychedelics has increased in the past two decades. The psychological effects of these substances outside the period of acute intoxication have not been fully characterized. This study aimed to: (1) quantify the effects of psilocybin, ayahuasca, and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on psychological outcomes in the post-acute period; (2) test moderators of these effects; and (3) evaluate adverse effects and risk of bias.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies (single-group pre-post or randomized controlled trials) that involved administration of psilocybin, ayahuasca, or LSD to clinical or non-clinical samples and assessed psychological outcomes ⩾24 h post-administration. Effects were summarized by study design, timepoint, and outcome domain.

Results: A total of 34 studies (24 unique samples, n = 549, mean longest follow-up = 55.34 weeks) were included. Classical psychedelics showed significant within-group pre-post and between-group placebo-controlled effects on a range of outcomes including targeted symptoms within psychiatric samples, negative and positive affect-related measures, social outcomes, and existential/spiritual outcomes, with large between-group effect in these domains (Hedges' g s = 0.84 to 1.08). Moderator tests suggest some effects may be larger in clinical samples. Evidence of effects on big five personality traits and mindfulness was weak. There was no evidence of post-acute adverse effects.

Conclusions: High risk of bias in several domains, heterogeneity across studies, and indications of publication bias for some models highlight the need for careful, large-scale, placebo-controlled randomized trials.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on serotonin, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of serotonergic psychedelics for the management of mood, anxiety, and substance-use disorders: a systematic review of systematic reviews Patients with mood, anxiety, or substance-use disorders, including cancer patients and... 2018 Systematic review of systematic reviews
Adverse events in clinical treatments with serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA: A mixed-methods systematic review Patients in clinical trials with MDMA or serotonergic psychedelics 2022 Systematic review n = 598
Classic serotonergic psychedelics for mood and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of mood disorder patients and healthy participants Healthy volunteers and patients with mood disorders 2021 Meta-analysis n = 257
Serotonergic psychedelics and personality: A systematic review of contemporary research 2018 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 54

and 49 more in the library

Cites 62

and 57 more in the library

Explore topics