Theoretical, and epistemological challenges in scientific investigations of complex emotional states in animals.
Yury V M Lages, Daniel C Mograbi, Thomas E Krahe, J Landeira-Fernandez
Consciousness and Cognition September 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.103003 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Affective neuroscience Anthropomorphism Dual-aspect monism Emotions Feelings Umwelt |
| Key findings | Theoretical frameworks, including anthropomorphism, Umwelt perspectives, and distinct consciousness theories, critically shape and constrain the study of complex emotional states in animals. |
Abstract
This review brings to light critical epistemological and theoretical considerations when studying complex emotional states in animals. We discuss anthropomorphic and Umwelt perspectives of nonhuman animals and the ways in which distinct theories of consciousness and neural processing may restrict the potential for the development of knowledge on the topic. Within the same line of argumentation, we consider influences of the debate between monism and dualism and psychology's behaviorism and cognitive theories. Finally, we contrast the affective consciousness, higher-order emotional consciousness, and constructed emotion theories to further our understanding of complex emotional states in animals.
Citations in the library
Cites 13
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness The MIT Press eBooks March 26, 1996
- The biological function of consciousness Frontiers in Psychology August 5, 2014
- Why Brains Are Not Computers, Why Behaviorism Is Not Satanism, and Why Dolphins Are Not Aquatic Apes. The Behavior Analyst May 1, 2016
- Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences September 1, 2019
and 8 more in the library