Where's My Consciousness-Ometer? How to Test for the Presence and Complexity of Consciousness.
Tam Hunt, Marissa Ericson, Jonathan W. Schooler
Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science July 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1177/17456916211029942 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAs tools for measuring consciousness emerge, there is no settled theory of what they measure. This article categorizes tests that infer the presence and complexity of phenomenal or subjective experience, proposing a taxonomy of measurable correlates of consciousness (MCC) with three subcategories: neural, behavioral, and creative correlates. It also suggests ways different theories of consciousness might be empirically distinguished and reflects on how broader philosophical views, such as materialism and panpsychism, could be informed by scientific evidence.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Consciousness Empiricism Psychometer |
| Citations | 52 |
| Key finding | Proposes a taxonomy of measurable correlates of consciousness (MCC) to organize tests for consciousness and suggests ways to empirically distinguish theories of consciousness. |
Abstract
Tools and tests for measuring the presence and complexity of consciousness are becoming available, but there is no established theoretical approach for what these tools are measuring. This article examines several categories of tests for making reasonable inferences about the presence and complexity of consciousness (defined as the capacity for phenomenal/subjective experience) and also suggests ways in which different theories of consciousness may be empirically distinguished. We label the various ways to measure consciousness the measurable correlates of consciousness (MCC) and include three subcategories in our taxonomy: (a) neural correlates of consciousness, (b) behavioral correlates of consciousness, and (c) creative correlates of consciousness. Finally, we reflect on how broader philosophical views about the nature of consciousness, such as materialism and panpsychism, may also be informed by the scientific process.