Skip to content

Psilocybin and chronic neuropathic pain: a systematic review

Harman Chopra, Shravani Durbhakula, Alexander Shustorovich, Tanya Juneja, Tariq AlFarra, Caroline Silver, Greg Kreitzer, Philip Oreoluwa, Braden B Weissman, Abraham AlFarra, Vwaire Orhurhu, Trent Emerick, Timothy Furnish, David S Jevotovsky, Daniel Pak, Mustafa Broachwala, Brian Mayrsohn, Joel Castellanos

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine August 5, 2024 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105532 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 28
Population Studies evaluating psilocybin for chronic pain management
Intervention Psilocybin
Dose 0.14 mg/kg
Topics Psilocybin
Keywords Neuropathic pain Chronic pain Pain management
Citations 8
Key findings Psilocybin shows potential for chronic pain relief, but the evidence is generally low quality, with most studies rated low or very low.

Abstract

Background/Importance Chronic pain affects many people globally, requiring alternative management strategies. Psilocybin is gaining attention for its potential in chronic pain management despite being classified as Schedule I.

Objective: This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence for psilocybin, a Schedule I substance, in the treatment of chronic pain. The exact purpose of the review is to assess the impact of psilocybin on chronic pain relief, focusing on dosing protocols, treated conditions, and patient outcomes. Evidence Review A comprehensive review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE was conducted up to January 2024. Eligibility criteria included studies evaluating psilocybin for chronic pain management. The risk of bias was assessed using the MASTER (MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research) scale, and the strength of evidence was graded using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

Findings: The review identified 28 relevant studies focusing on dosing, treated conditions, and outcomes. The majority of the included studies (76.2%) were of low or very low quality. Several studies with moderate-to-low-quality evidence utilized a 0.14 mg/kg dosing protocol. The findings suggest promise for the use of psilocybin in chronic pain relief, though the quality of evidence is generally low.

Conclusions: The current research shows potential for psilocybin as a treatment option for chronic pain relief. However, methodological issues and a lack of high-quality evidence underscore the need for further investigations with standardized protocols. Despite these limitations, the potential for psilocybin in chronic pain management is encouraging. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023493823.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psilocybin, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188
Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials 2021 Systematic review
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review
The experimental effects of psilocybin on symptoms of anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis People with elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression 2020 Meta-analysis n = 117
Default Mode Network Modulation by Psychedelics: A Systematic Review Participants from included studies 2022 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics