Perturbing whole‐brain models of brain hierarchy: An application for depression following pharmacological treatment
Marcel Socoró-garrigosa, Yonatan Sanz Perl, Morten L. Kringelbach, David Erritzøe, David Nutt, Robin Carhart-Harris, Jakub Vohryzek, Gustavo Deco
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences July 21, 2025 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15391 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Computational modeling study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Depressed patients before and after interventions |
| Interventions | Psilocybin Escitalopram |
| Topics | Depression Psilocybin Psychedelic-assisted therapy |
| Keywords | Hierarchy Neurostimulation Psychedelics Whole‐brain modeling Mental health Mood disorder Affective disorder Psychiatric condition Hallucinogens Psychotropic drugs Brain science Brain organization Whole-brain modeling Neurobiology Brain stimulation Neuromodulation Therapeutic stimulation |
| Citations | 3 |
| Key points | Susceptibility to change was on average reduced by escitalopram and increased by psilocybin, and both treatments promoted healthier transitions in brain states. |
Abstract
Abstract Determining the scale of neural representations is a central challenge in neuroscience. While localized representations have traditionally dominated, evidence suggests information is also encoded in distributed, hierarchical networks. Recent research indicates that the hierarchy of causal influences shaping functional patterns serves as a signature of distinct brain states, with implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Here, we first explore how whole‐brain models, guided by the thermodynamics of mind framework, estimate brain hierarchy and how perturbing such models enables the study of in‐silico transitions represented by static functional connectivity. We then apply this to major depressive disorder, where different brain hierarchical reconfigurations emerge following psilocybin and escitalopram treatments. We build resting‐state whole‐brain models of depressed patients before and after interventions and conduct a dynamic sensitivity analysis to explore brain states’ susceptibility—measuring their capacity to change—and their drivability to healthier states. We show that susceptibility is on average reduced by escitalopram and increased by psilocybin, and that both treatments promote healthier transitions. These results align with the post‐treatment window of plasticity opened by serotonergic psychedelics and the similar clinical efficacy of both drugs in trials. Overall, this work demonstrates how whole‐brain models of brain hierarchy can inform in‐silico neurostimulation protocols for neuropsychiatric disorders.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
- Distinct brain responses to psilocybin and escitalopram in depression captured by the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) June 16, 2026
- Divergent changes in perturbation-induced brain reconfiguration following depression treatment with psilocybin and escitalopram bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) June 26, 2026
Cites 23
- Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. The Lancet Psychiatry May 17, 2016
- Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression New England Journal of Medicine April 14, 2021
- REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics Pharmacological Reviews June 20, 2019
- Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial Psychological Medicine June 15, 2018
- Psychedelics promote neuroplasticity through the activation of intracellular 5-HT2A receptors Science February 16, 2023
and 18 more in the library