Quantum Non-Locality and Phenomenal Unity: A Theoretical Framework and Proposed Neural Bell Test.

Abstract

This paper presents a programmatic theoretical hypothesis rather than an empirical finding.We propose that quantum non-locality may be necessary — not merely sufficient — forphenomenal consciousness: the intrinsic ‘what it is like’ quality identified by Nagel (1974).Drawing on Wheeler’s informational ontology stripped of its participatory framing, theframework situates quantum information as the ontological primitive from which time,matter, life, and ultimately consciousness are proposed to emerge. The binding problem —the intrinsic non-decomposability of phenomenal unity — is identified as requiring aphysical correlate with formally identical properties. The hypothesis proposes that quantumnon-separability, operationally defined by Bell inequality violations, is the only currentlyformalised candidate satisfying this requirement. Classical systems, regardless ofcomplexity or global integration, remain in principle factorizable; the framework proposesthat this factorizability is the structural barrier to phenomenal unity. Fisher’s Posnermolecule mechanism — entangled phosphorus nuclear spins in Ca (PO ) clusters — is9 4 6proposed as the most physically credible biological substrate currently available, situatedwithin the broader context of quantum biology. Prior quantum mind theories — specificallyStapp’s observer-based account and Atmanspacher’s dual-aspect approach — are engageddirectly and distinguished from the physicalist identity framework proposed here. A NeuralBell Test is formalised as the primary empirical target: the hypothesis predicts CHSHparameter S > 2 in conscious neural states and S ≤ 2 in unconscious states. An interimexperimental programme toward that target is outlined. Current limitations are statedexplicitly and without mitigation. The paper is offered as a framework for debate,refinement, and attempted falsification — defining a research programme rather thanreporting a result.