Skip to content

Exploring differences in mindfulness and mindful eating between adults with varying weight status.

Christian E Preissner, Dennis De Ruijter, Hein De Vries, Anke Oenema

Eating and weight disorders : EWD March 31, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s40519-026-01848-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,118
Population Dutch adults, mean age 52.1, grouped by BMI as lower weight, overweight, or obesity
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Obesity Body weight Body mass index Cross-sectional studies Feeding behavior Adult Middle aged Female Overweight Bmi Awareness Mindful eating
Key findings No differences appeared between BMI groups in dispositional mindfulness facets. Participants with obesity showed greater awareness of environmental cues affecting their eating and a lower capacity to refrain from reactive responses and judgment toward their eating than participants with lower weight. The authors suggest behavior-specific mindful eating may be relevant to healthy weight management and that these exploratory findings need replication with longitudinal designs.

Abstract

Purpose: Mindfulness is increasingly being investigated as a relevant factor for weight management. It is currently unclear how and which underlying dispositional mindfulness and eating behavior-specific mindfulness processes are related to body weight. The purpose of this study was to investigate how dispositional mindfulness and mindful eating facets differ between adults with lower weight, overweight, and obesity.

Methods: Dutch adults (N = 1118; Mage = 52.1) completed a cross-sectional assessment of dispositional mindfulness, mindful eating, and body mass index (BMI). Multivariate analyses were used to examine differences between BMI groups (i.e., participants with lower weight, overweight, and obesity) on dispositional mindfulness and mindful eating facets, controlling for demographics and meditation experience.

Results: There were no differences between the BMI groups in dispositional mindfulness facets. In terms of mindful eating, participants with obesity showed a heightened awareness of the effects of environmental cues on their eating behavior, and a lower capacity to refrain from reactive responses and judgment toward their eating, in comparison to participants with a lower weight.

Conclusion: Results suggest that behavior-specific mindful eating may be a relevant factor to address to promote healthy weight management in the general, non-treatment-seeking population. These explorative findings need to be replicated and explored further through studies utilizing more robust, longitudinal research designs.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics