Skip to content

Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on cognitive impairment in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shuqin Jiang, Yaoyao Sun, Lixiang Yu, Xinjie Hu, Jie Li

International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100576 (opens in new tab)

The journal has published a correction to this paper. Read the correction (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 30
Population Cancer patients
Intervention Mindfulness interventions
Topics Meditation
Keywords Cognitive impairment Meta-analysis Mindfulness interventions Quality of life Systematic review Path Subjective cognitive ability Perceived cognitive function Objective cognitive function Cancer patients Cancer survivors Insight
Citations 9
Key findings Mindfulness interventions significantly improved subjective cognitive function in cancer patients both post-intervention and at follow-up, but no significant effects were observed on objective cognitive function.

Abstract

Cognitive impairment has been widely reported among cancer survivors, significantly impacting their quality of life. Mindfulness interventions are increasingly used to alleviate cognitive impairment in patients with cancer. This study aimed to assess the effects of mindfulness interventions on cognitive impairment in patients with cancer post-intervention and at follow-up. Up until February 2024, five English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO) and three Chinese databases (CNKI, Wan Fang, and CBM) were searched to identify relevant studies. To determine the effect size, we used random effects model to compute the standardized mean difference and 95 % confidence intervals. We included 23 randomized controlled trials and seven non-randomized controlled trials. Mindfulness interventions significantly improved patients' subjective cognitive function post-intervention (SMDbetween-group=0.81, 95 %CI: 0.58 to 1.03; SMDwithin-group=1.12, 95 %CI: 0.71 to 1.52) and at follow-up (SMDbetween-group=0.39, 95 %CI: 0.09 to 0.68; SMDwithin-group=0.59, 95 %CI: 0.35 to 0.82). Subgroup analysis indicated significantly larger effect of the interventions in developing countries than those in developed countries (p between-group=0.014; p within-group=0.008), and of the interventions without additional home practice than those with home practice in within-group comparisons (p between-group=0.217; p within-group=0.018). There were no significant differences in the effects between interventions lasting ≥eight weeks and < eight weeks (p between-group=0.093; p between-group=0.303). However, no significant effects were observed on objective cognitive function. Mindfulness-based interventions can effectively improve the subjective cognitive function in cancer patients both post-intervention and at follow-up. Future intervention research should take into account regions, home practice, and intervention duration.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics