Skip to content

Talking About Cannabis: Perspectives of First Episode Psychosis Care Participants and Parents

Alicia Lucksted, Donna Bencivengo, A. Saravana, Yasmine Boumaiz, Julie Kreyenbuhl, Russell L. Margolis, Swati Nayar, Kathryn Rinehimer, Krissa Rouse, Rachel Scheinberg, Elizabeth C. Thomas, Denise D. Walker, Max Wolcott, Elizabeth Burris, Ladawn Myers, Christian Kelly, Alison Swigart, Crystal L. Vatza, Allison S. Brandt, Deepak K. Sarpal, Richard W. Goldberg, Robert W. Buchanan, Tyler M Moore, Megan B. E. Jumper, A. Fooks, Arielle Ered, Monica E Caulkins, Melanie Bennett

Journal of dual diagnosis December 25, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2025.2606020 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Qualitative study Peer reviewed
Sample size 31
Population Young people receiving Coordinated Specialty Care for first-episode psychosis (n=15) and their parents (n=16)
Topics Cannabis
Key findings Clients and parents largely agreed on what makes cannabis conversations positive, but had difficulty understanding each other's perspectives and both felt misunderstood. Four themes were identified for optimizing communication: respect for developing client autonomy, "Good Information" about cannabis and its effects, a good communication process, and conversations complicated by changing norms. The authors propose that communication-skills interventions with non-judgmental, high-quality information could help.

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: Given important links between cannabis use and psychosis, we explored communications around about cannabis use with young people receiving Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) for first episodes of psychosis and parents of such clients.

Methods: In individual semi-structured interviews, clients (n = 15) and parents (n = 16) discussed experiences, concerns, and preferences talking about cannabis use, and how such conversations could be more beneficial. Analysis followed Braun and Clark’s six-phase thematic analysis.

Results: We discerned four themes toward optimizing communication: (1) Respect for Developing Client Autonomy, (2) “Good Information” about Cannabis and Its Effects, (3) Good Communication Process, and (4) Conversations Complicated by Changing Norms.

Conclusions: Analysis revealed agreement between clients and parents about what makes conversations positive, but difficulties understanding each other’s perspectives, and both feeling misunderstood. Interventions that build communication skills, support these difficult conversations, and provide high quality information in non-judgmental ways could support better cannabis discourse.

Comparable studies

Other qualitative studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Psychoactive substances as a last resort—a qualitative study of self-treatment of migraine and cluster headaches Users of online forums discussing cluster headache and migraine treatments 2017 Qualitative thematic analysis
Psychoactive drug or mystical incense? Overview of the online available information on Spice products Web pages related to Spice products 2009 Qualitative study n = 200
Patterns, Trends, and Meanings of Drug Use by Dance-drug Users in Edinburgh, Scotland Clubbers in clubs and pre-club bars 2004 Cross-sectional survey with focus groups n = 124
Fascination and Social Togetherness-Discussions about Spice Smoking on a Swedish Internet Forum. Swedish internet forum users who posted reports about Spice intoxication 2013 Qualitative study n = 40
Cannabis as entheogen: survey and interview data on the spiritual use of cannabis. Participants recruited from seven online communities, median age 33, 81% male 2020 Mixed methods (qualitative interviews and quantitative survey) n = 319

Citations in the library

Explore topics