Skip to content

Why Should Sīla Lead to Samādhi? Hindrances, Pleasure, and the Transformation of Mind in Early Buddhism

Grzegorz L. Polak

Religions November 5, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/rel17111300 (opens in new tab)

Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism
Key points Argues that in relevant Nikāya contexts being samāhita need not consist in consciousness occupying a single determinate object, but may be identified by cognitive workability and readiness for purposive use. Proposes the five hindrances as a bridge linking conduct, samādhi, and understanding, since weakening the motivational pressures behind them can reduce processes that pre-empt cognition and contribute to the mind becoming gathered.

Abstract

Why should sīla lead to samādhi? If samādhi is interpreted as an independently trainable capacity for sustained concentration, its systematic dependence on ethical and motivational cultivation is difficult to explain. I argue that, in relevant Nikāya contexts, being samāhita need not be constituted by a particular relation between mind and object, including the exclusive occupation of consciousness by a single determinate content. Cognitive workability and readiness for purposive use may instead identify a more general functional feature of being samāhita, without excluding states of intense deliberate engagement with a particular object. Against this background, I examine the five hindrances (nīvaraṇa) as a possible bridge between conduct, samādhi, and understanding. Several hindrances do more than distract attention: they express motivational pressures that recruit cognition toward acquisition, resistance, reconsideration, or resolution. Disciplined conduct, sense restraint, moderation, and related practices can progressively weaken the motivational dispositions from which these pressures arise. Their weakening can therefore contribute directly to the mind’s becoming gathered and workable by reducing processes that repeatedly pre-empt cognition. The same transformation also has an affective dimension. In the Sāmaññaphala Sutta, recognition of the abandonment of the hindrances gives rise to pāmojja, pīti, tranquillity, and sukha. Drawing also on the Cūḷadukkhakkhandha Sutta, I suggest that this experience can do more than reinforce an intellectual understanding of the drawbacks of sensuality that remains soteriologically insufficient. When the desired object remains unobtained while wanting itself subsides and wellbeing nevertheless improves, the practitioner encounters potentially transformative experiential evidence concerning the causal structure of dukkha: what appeared to be a felt deficiency—one important form of dukkha—caused by the absence of the desired object may instead have been produced or intensified by the desire itself. The resulting model presents sīla, the absence of the hindrances, affective transformation, samādhi, and understanding as dynamically connected aspects of a single developmental process and helps explain why ethical discipline can progressively reduce both motivational disturbance and the need for continuous effortful regulation.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. 2006 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience 1995 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Buddhist and Psychological Perspectives on Emotions and Well-Being 2005 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Too Early to Tell: The Potential Impact and Challenges—Ethical and Otherwise—Inherent in the Mainstreaming of Dharma in an Increasingly Dystopian World 2017 Theoretical or philosophical paper
From self to nonself: The Nonself Theory 2016 Theoretical or philosophical paper

Citations in the library

Cites 5

Related reading

Explore topics

Buddhism Addiction Meditation