Skip to content

Memory Systems and the Psychoanalytic Retrieval of Memories of Trauma

C. Brooks Brenneis

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association August 1, 1996 DOI: 10.1177/000306519604400409 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 21
Key points Argues that psychoanalytic propositions about a special traumatic memory have underlying flaws when extended to patients without explicit memory of trauma: dissociation is described as chameleonlike and perhaps as closely tied to suggestibility as to trauma, state-dependent learning does not adequately account for absent explicit memory, and implicit memory does not map directly onto explicit memory. Concludes that clinical application of these propositions may warrant considerable caution and offers provisional guidelines for estimating the validity of retrieved trauma memories.

Abstract

Increasingly, psychoanalysis has confronted the issue of recovered memories of childhood trauma. Based on trauma research, the concept of a special traumatic memory has evolved. Overwhelming psychic experience is thought to generate a defensively altered state of consciousness (specifically dissociation), which encodes memory in unassimilated visual, somatic, and behavioral, rather than linguistic modes. Analytic reevocation and interpretation of the original altered states of consciousness then permits the transformation of "early" traumatic memory into "later" explicit memory. Examined from the vantage point of contemporary cognitive research and theory, underlying flaws may be found in these propositions when they are extended to patients without explicit memory of trauma: first, dissociation is a chameleonlike process, perhaps as closely associated with suggestibility as with trauma; second, state-dependent learning does not adequately account for the absence of explicit memory; and third, implicit memory does not map onto explicit memory in any direct or simple fashion. Consequently, the clinical application of current propositions about traumatic memory to patients without explicit memory of trauma may warrant considerable caution. Provisional guidelines are offered for estimating the validity of retrieved memories of trauma.

Explore topics