Alcohol and marijuana effects on static visual acuity.
A J Adams, B Brown, M C Flom, R T Jones, A Jampolsky
American journal of optometry and physiological optics November 1975 DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197511000-00001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Double-blind experiment Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 10 |
| Population | Ten human subjects |
| Interventions | Alcohol Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Placebo |
| Dose | 0.5 ml and 1.0 ml/kg body weight of 95% ethanol; 8 and 15 mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) |
| Duration | Measurements up to six hours following drug ingestion |
| Measures | static visual acuity |
| Topics | Cannabis |
| Key findings | Alcohol and THC produced no statistically significant change in static visual acuity at any dose or time point up to six hours after ingestion, at either 12% or 49% contrast. The authors contrast this with marked acuity decrements in the same subjects under the same drug conditions when targets were moving and required coordinated eye movements. |
Abstract
Static visual acuity was measured at two contrast levels (12 and 49%) in ten subjects in a double blind experiment involving five drug conditions of alcohol and marijuana (0.5 ml and 1.0 ml/kg body weight of 95% ethanol, 8 and 15 mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and a placebo). We found no statistically significant change in static visual acuity for any of the dose levels at any of the measurement time up to six hours following drug ingestion; this is sharply contrasted with the marked decrements in acuity which were found in the same subjects under the same drug conditions when the targets were in motion and required corrdinated eye movements for their resolution.
Comparable studies
Other randomized controlled trials on cannabis, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment Healthy participants | 2012 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 48 |
| Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Healthy, English-native, right-handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in... | 2009 | Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial | n = 15 |
| Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers Healthy male subjects | 2012 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 16 |
| Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used... | 2009 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 15 |
| Cannabidiol (CBD) content in vaporized cannabis does not prevent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced impairment of driving and cognition Healthy volunteers with a history of light cannabis use | 2019 | Randomized, double-blind, within-subjects crossover | n = 14 |
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Self-Regulation of Driving Behavior Under the Influence of Cannabis: The Role of Driving Complexity and Driver Vision. Human factors November 2023
- Sex differences in the effects of marijuana on simulated driving performance. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs March 2010
- Biomarkers for the effects of cannabis and THC in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology January 2009
- Marihuana and driving. Accident; Analysis and Prevention August 1985