Skip to content

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lysergic acid diethylamide for the treatment of depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Andreea Chiorean, Helena Kyunghee Kim, Andrew Lustig, Muhammad Ishrat Husain

Journal of Psychopharmacology October 30, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/02698811261488460 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 227
Population Adults with mental disorders
Intervention LSD
Topics LSD
Key findings LSD treatment significantly reduced depression symptoms compared with comparators, with an unadjusted standardized mean difference of −0.69 (95% CI −0.96 to −0.42) and an adjusted difference of −0.65 (95% CI −0.92 to −0.38). The authors suggest LSD, with and without psychological support, reduces depression scores in clinical populations, while noting the small sample size and need for further trials.

Abstract

Background: Since the Food and Drug Administration designated lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as a “breakthrough” treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, accumulating randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating LSD’s anxiolytic effects have also reported improved depression symptoms. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of LSD in treating depression symptoms is warranted.

Methods: MEDLINE/PubMED, Embase, and PsychINFO were searched from inception to December 9, 2025. RCTs evaluating efficacy of LSD on depression symptoms in adults with mental disorders were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 and χ 2 and I 2 tests measured quality and heterogeneity. This review was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD420251063539).

Results: Of 465 screened studies, 5 RCTs met selection criteria ( N = 227). Our synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated that LSD treatment significantly reduced depression symptoms compared with the comparator (unadjusted standardized mean difference = −0.69; 95% CI: −0.96 to −0.42, p = 0.0000005; adjusted standardized mean difference = −0.65; 95% CI: −0.92 to −0.38, p = 0.000002). Studies varied in design and three of the included studies administered LSD with psychological support, although study-level heterogeneity was not significant. Three studies had low risk of bias. All-cause discontinuation demonstrated reasonable acceptability of LSD treatment. Severe adverse events possibly related to study parameters included hospitalizations ( N = 3) and acute anxiety/delusions ( N = 1).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that LSD, with and without psychological support, reduces depression scores in clinical populations. This review is limited by small sample size. Future well-designed RCTs are needed to establish the efficacy and safety of LSD in managing depression.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on LSD, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for alcoholism: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Participants in randomized controlled trials of LSD for alcoholism 2012 Meta-analysis n = 536
Antidepressive, anxiolytic, and antiaddictive effects of ayahuasca, psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD): a systematic review of clinical trials published in the last 25 years Patients from included clinical trials 2016 Systematic review
Default Mode Network Modulation by Psychedelics: A Systematic Review Participants from included studies 2022 Systematic review
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of serotonergic psychedelics for the management of mood, anxiety, and substance-use disorders: a systematic review of systematic reviews Patients with mood, anxiety, or substance-use disorders, including cancer patients and... 2018 Systematic review of systematic reviews
Therapeutic Use of LSD in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trials Patients with psychiatric disorders, primarily alcoholism 2020 Systematic review n = 567

Citations in the library

Explore topics