Colour, form, and movement are not perceived simultaneously.
P Viviani, C Aymoz
Vision research October 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00160-2 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Psychophysical experiment Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Human observers viewing 2D displays |
| Keywords | Humans Analysis of variance Linear models Normal distribution Form perception Color perception Motion perception Reaction time Psychophysics Female |
| Key findings | Colour and form were perceived almost simultaneously, while movement perception was delayed by about 50 ms relative to them. The author argues these timing differences bear on the "perceptual binding problem", the question of how separately processed visual features are combined into a unified percept. |
Abstract
Behavioural, neuro-anatomical and clinical evidence suggests that different aspects of the visual scene are processed separately, but the extent to which the processing is carried out along segregated and independent parallel pathways is still debated. Moreover, it is also unclear whether these aspects are processed at the same rate, and their neural correlates reach consciousness at the same time. An experiment investigated this issue in the case of three attributes of 2D displays: colour, form, and movement. There were three conditions, one for each possible pairing of these attributes. Stimuli were combinations of two values for each attribute (red/green, circle/square, fixed/moving). In each condition the stimuli changed twice in close temporal succession, each attribute switching asynchronously between the two possible values. The observer's task was to report which change had occurred first. Response probabilities were computed for 13 values of the asynchrony, and transformed into estimates of perception time with the help of a psychophysical model. The results showed that colour and form are processed almost simultaneously. By contrast, movement perception is delayed by about 50 ms. The implications of these findings vis à vis the so-called perceptual binding problem are discussed.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
- Roles of contour and surface processing in microgenesis of object perception and visual consciousness Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2011
- Contributions of magno- and parvocellular channels to conscious and non-conscious vision. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences May 5, 2014
Cites 3
- An extension to the hypothesis of the asynchrony of visual consciousness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2000
- Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition June 1, 1999
- The asynchrony of consciousness. Proceedings. Biological sciences August 1, 1998