“He may be lying but what he says is true”: the sacred tradition of don Juan as reported by Carlos Castaneda, anthropologist, trickster, guru, allegorist
Charlotte E. Hardman
Cambridge University Press eBooks November 29, 2007 DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511488450.003 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 9 |
| Key points | Argues that Castaneda's books seeded Western "neo-shamanism" and asks how so many in the West came to treat his early works as an ancient sacred tradition, and why his fame survived doubts about the authenticity of his sources, pointing to his imaginative creation and a new experiential ethnography. |
Abstract
Shamanism has intrigued the Western world for over 500 years. When in 1968 an inaccessible and inscrutable student of anthropology called Carlos Castaneda published his book The Teaching of Don Juan , a legion of seekers after truth, social scientists, and scientists in the Western world became fascinated by the worldview of a Yaqui sorcerer who was teaching Carlos to “see” at twilight through the crack in the universe to an alternative reality by ridding him of his blinkered Western logic. Castaneda's books sowed the seed of Western shamanism, often called neo-shamanism, which spread worldwide in the 1970s. Castaneda has been described as “one of the great avatars … of the psychedelic age” and “the principal psychological, spiritual and literary genius of recent generations,” and the Yaqui sorcerer don Juan as “the most important paradigm since Jesus.” The anthropologist Edith Turner sees Castaneda's research as a great liberation, taking us – “like Dante – through a dark passage out the other side into a state of enlightenment.” The two questions to be answered in this chapter are: (1) How did it come about that a large section of the Western world endowed Carlos Castaneda with such authority that his early books were welcomed as the discovery of an extraordinarily coherent ancient and sacred tradition? (2) When the authenticity of his sources was doubted, why did Castaneda's fame continue, focusing on his imaginative creation and the significance of a new kind of ethnography celebrating the experiential?