Skip to content

The Place of Imagination

J. Gatta

Oxford Scholarship Online July 19, 2018 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190646547.003.0004 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that imagination, beginning with Coleridge's seminal statements, carries theological implications and is integral with the phenomenology of place, rather than being an abstractly ethereal mental faculty. The author develops this through themes of the Earthiness of Imagination, the Contemplative Reach of Imagination, and Numinous Layers of Place as Palimpsest, drawing on Wendell Berry's 'imagination in place' and analyzing texts by Whitman, Marilyn Nelson, and Alfred Véa.

Abstract

“Imagination,” a word evidently central to the vocation and sensibility of English Romantic poets, is likewise invoked often as a defining term in American literary history. But what are the theological implications of this crucial category, beginning with Coleridge’s seminal statements about it? How might the human faculty of imagination—often but doubtfully associated with an abstractly ethereal quality of mind—bear upon concrete facts of the world humans experience? And how, in the light of philosophic perspectives, together with Wendell Berry’s provocative reflections on “imagination in place,” might Imagination be understood as integral with the phenomenology of place? Such questions are addressed here by means of themes bearing on the Earthiness of Imagination, the Contemplative Reach of Imagination, and Numinous Layers of Place as Palimpsest. Literary texts analyzed to develop these themes include Whitman’s verse and works by two contemporary writers—poet Marilyn Nelson and novelist Alfred Véa.

Explore topics