Skip to content

Intervention integrity in mindfulness-based research: strengthening a key aspect of methodological rigor.

Rebecca S. Crane

Current Opinion in Psychology October 5, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.009 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Commentary Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Biomedical research Research design
Key points Argues that Mindfulness-Based Program research should routinely assess and report intervention integrity, including teaching quality and curriculum adherence, because these likely affect outcomes and their interpretation. Notes that three integrity-assessment tools exist but need further development, and proposes systematic verification methods to ensure rigor and enable valid comparison across studies.

Abstract

To ensure methodological rigour, research on Mindfulness-Based Programs (MBPs) should include systems for assessing and reporting the integrity of the intervention. The critical variable of the quality of the teaching and the degree of adherence to the curriculum are likely to influence research outcomes and their interpretation. Currently, three tools for assessing intervention integrity in the MBP field have been developed, but they need further research and development. Research going forward needs to include systematic methods for demonstrating and verifying the integrity of the MBP, both to ensure the rigor of individual studies and to enable different studies of the same MBP to be fairly and validly compared with each other.

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 12

and 7 more in the library

Explore topics