Skip to content

Adding historical depth to definitions of mindfulness.

Bhikkhu Anālayo

Current Opinion in Psychology October 9, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.013 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Meditation
Keywords Humans Awareness History, ancient Mind-body therapies
Key points Argues that semantic ambiguity around 'mindfulness' hampers Mindfulness-Based Intervention research and that historical and doctrinal sources from Buddhist traditions can add depth to definitions. Proposes comparing clinical applications with related Buddhist teachings through cross-disciplinary dialogue between Buddhist studies and psychology to better understand what mindfulness involves and how it operates.

Abstract

Research on Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI) is hampered by semantic ambiguity surrounding the term 'mindfulness'. Understanding the core quality involved in such research could be improved by adding historical depth to definitions of mindfulness, based on more detailed information on mindfulness from text-historical and doctrinal sources in the Buddhist traditions. Particular applications of mindfulness in current clinical usage could be compared to related approaches or doctrinal teachings in Buddhist traditions as part of an ongoing cross-disciplinary dialogue between academics in Buddhist studies and in psychology under the shared aim of deepening our understanding of what mindfulness involves and how it operates.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics