Skip to content

“THE NEW SCIENCE OF HEALTH AND HAPPINESS”: INVESTIGATING BUDDHIST ENGAGEMENTS WITH THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF MEDITATION

Jeff Wilson

Zygon® February 12, 2018 DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12391 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Meditation
Key points Argues that Buddhists use scientific studies of meditation in varied ways—to lend scientific authority to Buddhism, to claim Buddhism's superiority over science, and, in intra-Buddhist debates, both to press for changes in practice or belief and to reinforce traditional practices. Proposes that Zeller's guide/replace/absorb categories and Cabezón's conflict-ambivalence/compatibility-identity/complementarity types help analyze these uses.

Abstract

Clinical and neuroscientific studies of Buddhist meditation practices are frequent topics in the news media, and have helped certain practices (such as mindfulness) achieve mainstream cultural status. Buddhists have reacted by using these studies in a number of ways. Some deploy the studies to show the compatibility of science and Buddhism, often using the authority of science to lend credence to Buddhism. Other Buddhists use meditation studies to demonstrate the superiority of Buddhism over science. Within inter‐Buddhist debates, meditation studies are used to argue for changes in practice or belief, but also sometimes to reinforce certain traditional practices. Benjamin Zeller's threefold categorization of religious groups’ attitudes toward science (guide, replace, absorb) and José Ignacio Cabezón's three ideal types of relationships between Buddhism and science (conflict/ambivalence, compatibility/identity, complementarity) contribute to analysis of Buddhist uses of scientific studies of meditation.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Explore topics