The reflexive imagery task: An experimental paradigm for neuroimaging
Hyein Cho, Wei Dou, Zaviera Reyes, Mark W. Geisler, Ezequiel Morsella
AIMS Neuroscience 2018 DOI: 10.3934/neuroscience.2018.2.97 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review with new experimental data Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 7 |
| Key findings | The authors report that instructing people not to name visually presented objects still produces involuntary subvocalizations on roughly 80% of trials. In a new two-object variant, involuntary subvocalizations occurred on a mean of 0.78 of trials, and an RIT effect arose for both objects on a mean of 0.35 of trials; a second experiment with a different sample replicated these findings. |
Abstract
High-level cognitions can be triggered into consciousness through the presentation of external stimuli and the activation of certain action sets. These activations arise in a manner that is involuntary, systematic and nontrivial. For example, in the Reflexive Imagery Task (RIT), subjects are presented with visual objects and instructed to not think of the names of the objects. Involuntary subvocalizations arise on roughly 80% of the trials. We review the findings from this paradigm, discuss neural findings that are relevant to the RIT, and present new data that further corroborate the reliability and robustness of the RIT, a paradigm that could be coupled with neuroimaging technologies. We developed an RIT variant in which two, non-focal objects are presented simultaneously. In previous RITs, visual objects were presented only one at a time, in the center of the screen, and subjects were instructed to focus on the center of the screen, where these objects were presented. Replicating the RIT effect, involuntary subvocalizations still occurred on a high proportion of trials (M = 0.78). An RIT effect arose for both objects on a considerable proportion of the trials (M = 0.35). These findings were replicated in a second experiment having a different sample of subjects. Our findings are relevant to many subfields of neuroscience (e.g., the study of high-level mental processes, attention, imagery and action control).
Citations in the library
Cites 12
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- Conscious contents as reflexive processes: Evidence from the habituation of high-level cognitions. Consciousness and Cognition April 2016
- Homing in on consciousness in the nervous system: An action-based synthesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences January 2016
- External control of the stream of consciousness: Stimulus-based effects on involuntary thought sequences. Consciousness and Cognition May 1, 2015
and 7 more in the library