Cooley and the human consciousness
Klaus G. Witz
Routledge eBooks October 10, 2018 DOI: 10.4324/9781315104515-8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Cooley's work is still intensely alive in two ways: as an early example of using first-person experience to study consciousness scientifically, and through his "Principle of Sympathetic Introspection," which the author says has inspired "Essentialist Case Studies" and "Essentialist Portraits" since 1993 as a means of understanding subjective experience of higher values and spiritual aspects of life. |
Abstract
This chapter focuses on two broad ways in which Cooley’s work is still intensely alive in the minds and work of researchers and philosophers today. First, in philosophy in the area of consciousness studies and in phenomenological studies in psychology, there has been a growing movement to the effect that accounts of “first person experience,” that is accounts of experience of the form “then I felt …” “I firmly believe …” (such accounts by themselves, without reductive arguments and without having to point to correlated phenomena in the neural—biological substrate) represent a completely scientific way of studying human consciousness. Cooley’s work is an early and extremely significant example of social science research that that amounts to using “first person experience” to studying consciousness this way. And second, Cooley’s “Principle of Sympathetic Introspection” and his whole approach to studying human life and experience has inspired my students and me in our “Essentialist Case Studies” and “Essentialist Portraits” of individuals since 1993, as illustrating that there can be a real understanding of subjective experience of higher values and ideals, and, more generally, of spiritual aspects involved in daily living and human life as a whole.