Skip to content

The Geometry, Topology, and Dynamics of Consciousness: Four Preliminary Formal Hypotheses

Wanhong Huang

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University) October 21, 2026 DOI: 10.17613/qxjqv-w3z41 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Proposes a preliminary taxonomy of four mathematical orientations—Variation, Trajectory, Generativity, and Repertoire—for investigating consciousness through relational and dynamical representations. Argues that these hypotheses are potentially overlapping explanatory orientations, not established accounts of phenomenal consciousness, and that formal correspondences may preserve some structures while losing others. A semigroup metamodel supplies a minimal comparative vocabulary but leaves the appearance of new distinctions, evolving constraints, and the realization of subjective experience unresolved.

Abstract

The present paper develops a preliminary taxonomy of four mathematical orientations for investigating consciousness through relational and dynamical representations. The Variation Hypothesis locates the candidate connection to consciousness in the organization of transformations; the Trajectory Hypothesis considers selected paths, flows, or relationally ordered histories; the Generativity Hypothesis examines the coupled organization of change, structure, constraint, and difference, including possible transformations of the representational conditions themselves; and the Repertoire Hypothesis considers structured families of admissible histories. The programme uses manifolds, smooth and nonsmooth dynamics, CW-complexes and two-complexes, algebraic actions, and representation morphisms as alternative mathematical settings whose domains and interpretive commitments require separate specification. It distinguishes modal admissibility from temporal succession and treats parameterizations, causal order, and the historical status of observations as modeling choices. A previously developed semigroup metamodel supplies a minimal comparative vocabulary while leaving the appearance of new distinctions, evolving constraints, and the realization of subjective experience unresolved. Formal correspondences between representations may preserve specified structures while losing others; generative grammar serves only as a secondary illustrative instance. The four hypotheses are proposed as potentially overlapping explanatory orientations, not as established accounts of phenomenal consciousness. The paper's objective is to identify their mathematical commitments, discriminating examples, empirical interfaces, and explanatory limitations while maintaining ontological and epistemic restraint.

Explore topics