Skip to content

Medea of Colchis and the Magico-Religious Paradigms of the Ancient Near East

Tatia Davitadze

აღმოსავლეთმცოდნეობის მაცნე May 27, 2026 DOI: 10.61671/hos.v9i1.11626 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Medea should be read as an archetypal carrier of Ancient Near Eastern magico-religious paradigms, with her magic reflecting empirical medical and herbal knowledge of Colchis and the Near East rather than mere literary invention. Contends that her tragedy results from an inevitable collision between distinct cultural, religious, and ethical systems, and that Hellenic discourse deliberately demonized Eastern esoteric knowledge, making her "barbarism" central to her identity.

Abstract

The present paper aims to provide a complex scholarly inves­tigation into the phenomenon of Medea of Colchis through the dual lenses of Oriental Studies and Comparative Mythology. In this article, the figure of Medea is examined not merely as a character of Classical drama, but as an archetypal carrier of the magico-religious paradigms of the Ancient Near East (Mesopotamian, Hittite, and Egyptian). The relevance of this research is underscored by the fact that Medea represents a cultural "threshold" between Western (Hellenic) ration­alism and Eastern exotic mysticism. The study employs an inte­rdis­ciplinary approach, which allows for the discernment of underlying historical-cultural processes behind the mythological narrative. The first part of the work provides a detailed analysis of Med­ea’s close affiliation with the cult of the goddess Hecate and the lunar deities of the Near East, focusing on their functional characteristics and associated ritual practices. Particular attention is devoted to the phenomenon of pharmaka (drugs/medicines), which is interpreted in the article as an echo of Ancient Near Eastern medicine, herbal lore, and early alchemy within the Greek epic tradition. The article con­tends that Medea’s magical power is not solely a fairy-tale or literary element; rather, it reflects the empirical knowledge and traditions characteristic of Colchis and the Near Eastern regions—knowledge that was often perceived by the citizens of the Greek polis as an incomprehensible and dangerous force. The second part of the research is dedicated to the concept of "The Other" within Orientalist discourse. The paper explores how the deliberate demonization of Eastern esoteric knowledge occurred wit­hin the Hellenic world and why Medea’s "barbarism" became the pri­m­ary defining feature of her tragic identity. The article substantiates the view that Medea's tragedy is not merely a domestic drama, but the result of an inevitable collision between two distinct cultural, reli­gious, and ethical systems. In this context, Colchis emerges as a potent cultural center and a space of reception, where the transformation of Eastern mystical knowledge took place for its subsequent transmission into the Western intellectual sphere. The concluding section summarizes the research findings, con­firming that the reinterpretation of Medea’s persona - when accou­nting for Near Eastern paradigms - offers a fundamentally new per­spective on the interrelationship between Classical Mythology and Oriental Studies. The paper emphasizes that the phenomenon of Medea serves as a key to a more profound understanding of the global cultural interactions within the Ancient World.

Explore topics