Sex dreams: Gender, erotophilia, and sociosexuality as predictors of content, valence, and frequency
Amira Hmidan, Angela D. Weaver
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality June 29, 2019 DOI: 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0022 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational survey study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 482 |
| Population | Adults who completed an online survey about sexual dreams |
| Topics | Dreaming |
| Key findings | Men reported higher sociosexuality and more positive sex dream valence than women, with no gender differences in erotophilia or sex dream frequency. Higher sociosexuality and erotophilia predicted more frequent and more positively evaluated sex dreams; erotophilia and sociosexuality accounted for 24.3% of the variance in dream valence, and adding gender accounted for an additional 1.9%. Most recent sex dreams most commonly featured a current partner, a house or apartment, and kissing. |
Abstract
Abstract:The continuity hypothesis suggests that dream content is directly related to waking life experiences, personality traits, and gender; however, little is known about sexual dreaming. To address this gap, the current study examined how gender, sociosexuality (one's willingness to engage in sexual relations outside of committed relationships) and erotophilia (a learned disposition to respond positively to sexual stimuli) related to the content, frequency, and valence of sexual dreams. Participants (n = 482) completed an online survey assessing their sex dream experiences, sociosexuality, and erotophilia and were asked to describe their most recent sexual dream. Men scored higher on sociosexuality and sex dream valence than women, but there were no gender differences in erotophilia or sex dream frequency. Individuals who scored higher on sociosexuality and erotophilia reported experiencing more frequent sex dreams and evaluated them more positively. Hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that erotophilia and sociosexuality significantly predicted sex dream valence, accounting for 24.3% of the variance. The addition of gender at step 2 was significant, but only accounted for an additional 1.9% of the variance. Participants' descriptions of their most recent sex dream were analyzed for common themes related to variables such as the partner(s) involved (most common: current partner), location (most common: house/apartment), and types of sexual behaviors involved (most common: kissing). Exploratory analyses, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
Citations in the library
Cites 6
- Typical Dreams: Stability and Gender Differences The Journal of Psychology 2004
- Dream content and psychological well-being: A longitudinal study of the continuity hypothesis Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005
- The effects of a two-week reflection-intention training program on lucid dream recall. Dreaming March 1, 2006
- Lucid Dreaming Frequency and the Big Five Personality Factors Imagination, Cognition and Personality March 1, 2017
- Frequency of dream sharing: the effects of gender and personality. The American Journal of Psychology 2010
and 1 more in the library