Skip to content

From Mathematics to Mysticism and Back

Sasho Kalajdzievski

A K Peters/CRC Press eBooks October 12, 2023 DOI: 10.1201/9781003282198-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Population Mathematicians
Topics Mysticism
Key points Argues that mathematicians' training in open-mindedness and proof makes them disproportionately represented in the broad mystic realm and competent at scrutinizing claims. Also proposes that mystic or mystic-like experiences influence mathematicians' work, with later-life experiences having a more significant impact in the author's sample.

Abstract

Mathematicians are by trade predisposed to be open-minded and to consider the alternatives to the underlying axioms of a widely accepted theory. This is one of the reasons why they are disproportionately represented in the broad mystic realm. Moreover, they are aware of the philosophical and mathematical perils of non-critical acceptance of claims widely accepted as obvious or evident. Mathematicians know exactly what ‘proof’ means, and hence they are competent scrutinizers of arguments leading to various theories. In the opposite direction, we indicate how mystic, or mystic-like experiences, impact the work of mathematicians. Our sample of mathematicians seems to indicate that when these experiences occur later in one&s;s life, their impact on one&s;s mathematical work is more significant.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics