Skip to content

Only Small Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Biomarker Levels of Inflammation and Stress: A Preregistered Systematic Review and Two Three-Level Meta-Analyses.

Jakob Grasmann, Frederick Almenräder, Martin Voracek, Ulrich S. Tran

International Journal of Molecular Sciences February 23, 2023 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054445 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Meta-analysis Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 2,880
Population Psychiatric patients and healthy, stressed, and at-risk (subclinical) populations
Intervention Mindfulness-based interventions
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Inflammation Mental disorders Health status Biomarkers Cortisol Interleukin C-reactive protein Three-level meta-analysis Mbis
Key findings Mindfulness-based interventions were associated with small reductions in biomarkers of inflammation and stress: within-group pre-post change was Hedges g = -0.15 (k = 40, N = 1441), and the randomized controlled comparison was g = -0.11 (k = 32, N = 2880), whose 95% confidence interval included zero. The authors suggest MBIs may slightly improve biomarker levels in both psychiatric and subclinical populations, while cautioning that low study quality and evidence of publication bias may have affected the results.

Abstract

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have a positive effect on biomarkers of inflammation and stress in patients with psychiatric disorders and physical illnesses. Regarding subclinical populations, results are less clear. The present meta-analysis addressed the effects of MBIs on biomarkers in psychiatric populations and among healthy, stressed, and at-risk populations. All available biomarker data were investigated with a comprehensive approach, using two three-level meta-analyses. Pre-post changes in biomarker levels within treatment groups (k = 40 studies, total N = 1441) and treatment effects compared to control group effects, using only RCT data (k = 32, total N = 2880), were of similar magnitude, Hedges g = -0.15 (95% CI = [-0.23, -0.06], p < 0.001) and g = -0.11 (95% CI = [-0.23, 0.001], p = 0.053). Effects increased in magnitude when including available follow-up data but did not differ between type of sample, MBI, biomarker, and control group or duration of the MBI. This suggests that MBIs may ameliorate biomarker levels in both psychiatric and subclinical populations to a small extent. However, low study quality and evidence of publication bias may have impacted on the results. More large and preregistered studies are still needed in this field of research.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 9

and 4 more in the library

Cites 24

and 19 more in the library

Explore topics