Skip to content

Effects of online mindfulness-based interventions on the mental health of university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xiao-Gang Gong, Le-Peng Wang, Guang Rong, Dao-Ning Zhang, A-Yuan Zhang, Chao Liu

Frontiers in Psychology February 8, 2023 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073647 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Population University students
Topics Meditation
Keywords Meta-analysis Students Mental health Systematic review University Online
Key findings Online mindfulness-based interventions improved depression (SMD -0.27), anxiety (SMD -0.47), stress (SMD -0.58), and mindfulness (SMD 0.71) in university students across nine randomized controlled trials, but had no significant effect on wellbeing (SMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.60). The authors conclude that online MBIs could effectively improve mental health in this population while calling for more rigorously designed trials.

Abstract

Objectives: Mental health problems among university students are a cause of widespread concern. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) delivered online have considerable potential to help university students manage mental health challenges. However, there is no consensus regarding the efficacy of online MBIs. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether MBIs are feasible and effective for improving university students' mental health.

Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and the US National Library of Medicine (Clinical Trial Registry) published through August 31, 2022, were searched. Two reviewers selected the trials, conducted a critical appraisal, and extracted the data. Nine RCTs met our inclusion criteria.

Results: This analysis showed that online MBIs were effective in improving depression (standardised mean difference [SMD] = -0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.48 to -0.07; P = 0.008), anxiety (SMD = -0.47; 95% CI, -080 to -0.14; P = 0.006), stress (SMD = -0.58; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.37; P < 0.00001), and mindfulness (SMD = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.25; p = 0.009) in university students. No significant effect was found on wellbeing (SMD = 0.30; 95% CI, -0.00 to 0.60; P = 0.05).

Conclusion: The findings indicated that online MBIs could effectively improve the mental health of university students. Nevertheless, additional rigorously designed RCTs are required. Systematic review

Registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0099/, identifier INPLASY202290099.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 30

and 25 more in the library

Cites 20

and 15 more in the library

Explore topics