Developing a prognostic model for stress reduction in patients with prolonged work‐related stress
Johan Høy Jensen, Reiner Rugulies, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Kajsa Ugelvig Petersen, Lone Ross, Nanna Hurwitz Eller, Bassam Khoury
Stress and Health October 18, 2023 DOI: 10.1002/smi.3329 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Prognostic model development study with internal cross-validation Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 763 |
| Population | Patients attending MBSR programmes between October 2015 and March 2022 |
| Intervention | Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) |
| Duration | 9-session programme; data collected October 2015 to March 2022 |
| Measures | General Severity Index, perceived stress |
| Key points | Reductions in perceived stress from baseline to the end of the MBSR programme were predicted by a lower General Severity Index (β = 2.00), higher baseline perceived stress (β = -0.88), and somewhat by managerial responsibility in the latest job (β = -2.53, p = 0.07). The authors describe the model as prognostic, not causal, and caution that forecasting should be practiced with clinical judgement for individual patients. |
Abstract
Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a 9-session group-treatment programme for managing stress. Research suggests variability in the outcomes of MBSR among participants. This prognostic (not causal) study develops a multivariable model that may support clinicians in forecasting expected MBSR outcomes. We used data of 763 patients collected from MBSR programs conducted between October 2015 and March 2022. Candidate prognostic factors at baseline included psychosocial work environment, sociodemographic, and clinical information. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data (imputations = 200). Important prognostic factors were backward selected in ≥5% of the imputed datasets. The final prediction model including the selected prognostic factors was evaluated using linear regression with a four-fold internal cross-validation procedure. Reductions in perceived stress from baseline to end of the MBSR programme were predicted by a lower General Severity Index (β = 2.00, p < 0.01), higher baseline levels of stress (β = -0.88, p < 0.01), and somewhat by having managerial responsibility in the latest job (vs. no; β = -2.53, p = 0.07). The remaining prognostic factors were weaker predictors, for example, gender and income. Internal validity of the final model was indicated by consistent results from four randomly folded subsamples. This study developed a prognostic model predicting changes in stress levels in relation to the MBSR programme. A reduction in stress level was particularly predicted by milder psychological symptoms and higher baseline levels of perceived stress. These predictions cannot be taken as evidence of causal associations. Forecasting of the illness course should be cautiously practiced using clinical judgement regarding individual patients.
Citations in the library
Cites 5
- Examining the Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Difficult Experiences that Emerge during a Mindfulness-Based Intervention among Individuals at High-Risk of Suicide. Mindfulness June 18, 2024
- Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review February 1, 2018
- Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on employees’ mental health: A systematic review PLoS One January 24, 2018
- The Many Facets of Mindfulness and the Prediction of Change Following Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) Journal of Clinical Psychology August 16, 2017
- The Effect of Mindfulness-Based Therapy on Anxiety and Depression: A Meta-Analytic Review Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology April 1, 2010