Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychological distress in health workers: A three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial.
A. Errázuriz, K. Schmidt, E. Undurraga, Sebastián Medeiros, R. Baudrand, D. Cussen, Marcela Henríquez, Pablo Celhay, R. Figueroa
Journal of Psychiatric Research November 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.011 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) reduces short-term psychological distress in non-physician health workers with patient contact, but effects are not maintained at four-month follow-up. In a three-arm randomized controlled trial, 105 participants were assigned to MBSR, a Stress Management Course (SMC), or a wait-list. MBSR reduced psychological distress on the GHQ-12 and OQ-45 compared to both SMC and wait-list post-intervention. Only MBSR was associated with a 23% decrease in the cortisol awakening response. At four-month follow-up, only the 'social role' subscale of psychological distress remained significantly improved versus SMC.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 105 |
| Population | Non-physician health workers in direct contact with patients |
| Interventions | Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction Stress Management Course |
| Duration | 8-week intervention, 4-month follow-up |
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology |
| Key finding | MBSR reduced psychological distress post-intervention compared to both a Stress Management Course and a wait-list, but these effects were not maintained at four-month follow-up. |
Abstract
Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has shown good efficacy for improving wellbeing in employees experiencing occupational stress. However, comparisons with other interventions, longer-term follow-up, and data from varying sociocultural contexts are lacking. This three-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial (RCT) examined the effects of MBSR on psychological distress in non-physician health workers in direct contact with patients. 105 participants were randomly allocated to either: (1) MBSR (N = 35), (2) Stress Management Course (SMC; N = 34) or (3) wait-list (N = 36). Participants and those assessing outcomes were blinded to group assignment. Participants completed questionnaires pre- and post-intervention and four months after the intervention. Psychological distress was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45). Secondary outcomes included perceived stress, job satisfaction, mindfulness skills and changes in salivary cortisol. 77 participants completed measures post-intervention and 52 at 4-month follow-up. MBSR showed a post-intervention effect in reducing GHQ-12 (ß = -0.80 [SE = 1.58] p < 0.01) and OQ-45 (ß = -0.72, [SE = 5.87] p < 0.05) psychological distress, compared to SMC and in reducing GHQ-12 (ß = -1.30 [SE = 1.38] p < 0.001) and OQ-45 (ß = -0.71, [SE = 5.58] p < 0.01) psychological distress compared to wait-list condition. In our secondary outcome, only MBSR was associated with a decrease in the cortisol awaking response by 23% (p < 0.05). At follow-up, only effects of MBSR on the psychological distress 'social role' subscale (ß = -0.76 [SE = 1.31] p < 0.05) remained significant, compared to SMC. In conclusion, MBSR appears useful in reducing short-term psychological distress in healthcare workers, but these effects were not maintained at follow-up. Trial registration: ISRCTN12039804.