Skip to content

Determining the magnitude and duration of acute Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)-induced driving and cognitive impairment: A systematic and meta-analytic review.

D. McCartney, Thomas R. Arkell, Christopher Irwin, I. McGregor

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews January 23, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.003 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Dose 20 mg of Δ9-THC (inhaled)
Topics Cannabis
Key findings Meta-analyses found that peak Δ9-THC effects impaired driving performance and driving-related cognitive skills such as lateral control, tracking, and divided attention. Regular cannabis users showed less impairment than occasional users, and impairment magnitude depended on dose, time since use, and the skill assessed. A model predicted impairment would take about 7 hours to subside after inhaling 20 mg of Δ9-THC, with oral use possibly taking longer; the authors suggest waiting at least 7 hours after inhaled cannabis before safety-sensitive tasks.

Abstract

The increasing legal availability of cannabis has important implications for road safety. This systematic review characterised the acute effects of Δ9-THC on driving performance and driving-related cognitive skills, with a particular focus on the duration of Δ9-THC-induced impairment. Eighty publications and 1534 outcomes were reviewed. Several measures of driving performance and driving-related cognitive skills (e.g. lateral control, tracking, divided attention) demonstrated impairment in meta-analyses of "peak" Δ9-THC effects (p's<0.05). Multiple meta-regression analyses further found that regular cannabis use was associated with less impairment than 'other' (mostly occasional) cannabis use (p = 0.003) and that the magnitude of oral (n = 243 effect estimates [EE]) and inhaled (n = 481 EEs) Δ9-THC-induced impairment depended on various factors (dose, post-treatment time interval, the performance domain (skill) assessed) in other cannabis users (p's<0.05). The latter model predicted impairment would take ∼7 -hs to subside (Hedges' g=-0.25) after inhaling 20 mg of Δ9-THC; oral Δ9-THC-induced impairment may take longer to subside. These results suggest individuals should wait at least 7 -hs following inhaled cannabis use before performing safety-sensitive tasks.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Effects of cannabis use on outcomes of psychotic disorders: systematic review People with psychotic disorders, as examined in 13 longitudinal studies 2008 Systematic review
The Impact of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Existing Findings and New Data in a First-Episode Sample Patients with established schizophrenia (meta-analysis: 572) and patients with... 2010 Meta-analysis and cross-sectional observational study n = 700
Medicinal cannabis for psychiatric disorders: a clinically-focused systematic review 2020 Systematic review
Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review of the literature Cannabis users and controls in neuroimaging studies 2009 Systematic review
Human Laboratory Studies on Cannabinoids and Psychosis. Healthy human subjects and individuals with schizophrenia 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 22

and 17 more in the library

Cites 18

and 13 more in the library

Explore topics