Skip to content

Cognitive processes in dissociation: an analysis of core theoretical assumptions.

Timo Giesbrecht, Steven Jay Lynn, Scott O Lilienfeld, Harald Merckelbach

Psychological Bulletin September 2008 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.617 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Key findings The review indicates that dissociation is characterized by subtle neuropsychological deficits, such as heightened distractibility, and some cognitive phenomena like weakened cognitive inhibition depend on emotional or attentional context. Contrary to a widespread clinical assumption, dissociation does not appear related to avoidant information processing; rather, it is associated with an enhanced propensity toward pseudo-memories, possibly mediated by heightened interrogative suggestibility, fantasy proneness, and cognitive failures. Evidence for links to memory fragmentation or early trauma based on objective measures is lacking.

Abstract

Dissociation is typically defined as the lack of normal integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences into consciousness and memory. The present article critically evaluates the research literature on cognitive processes in dissociation. The authors' review indicates that dissociation is characterized by subtle deficits in neuropsychological performance (e.g., heightened distractibility). Some of the cognitive phenomena (e.g., weakened cognitive inhibition) associated with dissociation appear to be dependent on the emotional or attentional context. Contrary to a widespread assumption in the clinical literature, dissociation does not appear to be related to avoidant information processing. Rather, it is associated with an enhanced propensity toward pseudo-memories, possibly mediated by heightened levels of interrogative suggestibility, fantasy proneness, and cognitive failures. Evidence for a link between dissociation and either memory fragmentation or early trauma based on objective measures is conspicuously lacking. The authors identify a variety of methodological issues and discrepancies that make it difficult to articulate a comprehensive framework for cognitive mechanisms in dissociation. The authors conclude with a discussion of research domains (e.g., sleep-related experiences, drug-related dissociation) that promise to advance our understanding of cognition and dissociation.

Citations in the library

Explore topics