Rejoinder to responses to “Could Pam Reynolds hear?”
Journal of Near-Death Studies 2011 DOI: 10.17514/jnds-2011-30-1-p54-61. (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 18 |
| Key points | Argues that Pam Reynolds could have heard through normal physical processes during her near-death experience, maintaining this position against critiques by Stuart Hameroff and Chris Carter by addressing specifics of anesthesiology and neurosurgical technique. |
Abstract
In this article I provide a rejoinder to Stuart Hameroff's and Chris Carter's responses to my article, "Could Pam Reynolds Hear?" (2011, this issue). I address some specifics of anesthesiology and neurosurgical technique to maintain my contention that Reynolds could hear through normal physical processes during her near-death experience.