Skip to content

What is it like to be a person with schizophrenia in the social world? A first-person perspective study on Schizophrenic dissociality--part 1: state of the art.

Giovanni Stanghellini, Massimo Ballerini

Psychopathology 2011 DOI: 10.1159/000322637 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Qualitative Peer reviewed
Key findings The authors argue that phenomenological research on schizophrenic dissociality interprets it as an anomaly of prereflexive attunement but relies on a few typical cases, while cognitive research documents social functioning disorders in large-scale experiments but neglects personal experience in real-world functioning. They conclude that both quantitative and qualitative methods are needed to reliably capture the subjective experiences of people with schizophrenia.

Abstract

This is a critical review of research on the subjective experience of social dysfunction in persons with schizophrenia. Studies from the phenomenological and cognitive paradigms are examined, and significant outcomes and shortcomings are pointed out. Clinical phenomenologists have mainly interpreted schizophrenic dissociality as an anomaly of prereflexive attunement. The main shortcoming of phenomenological research is that it lacks adequate methodology to collect reliable data since most studies are based on the analysis of a few typical cases. Cognitivism has reliably documented disorders of social functioning in large-scale experimental studies. The main shortcoming of most cognitive paradigms is that they do not properly investigate the personal level of experience in real-world functioning. We conclude that there is a need to reliably collect data through quantitative as well as qualitative methodology as established and accepted by the scientific community in the area of schizophrenic dissociality, reflecting the subjective experiences of people with schizophrenia in the real world.

Citations in the library

Explore topics