Skip to content

Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the "rubber hand illusion" paradigm.

Henning Holle, Neil McLatchie, Stefanie Maurer, Jamie Ward

Cognitive Neuroscience 2011 DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2011.603828 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Measures proprioceptive drift, questionnaire
Key findings A rubber hand rotated by 180 degrees produced increased proprioceptive drift during synchronous stroking but did not produce feelings of ownership on the questionnaire. The authors argue this dissociation indicates proprioceptive drift is not necessarily a valid proxy for the illusion when using hands rotated by 180 degrees.

Abstract

The rubber hand illusion is one reliable way to experimentally manipulate the experience of body ownership. However, debate continues about the necessary and sufficient conditions eliciting the illusion. We measured proprioceptive drift and the subjective experience (via questionnaire) while manipulating two variables that have been suggested to affect the intensity of the illusion. First, the rubber hand was positioned either in a posturally congruent position, or rotated by 180°. Second, either the anatomically same rubber hand was used, or an anatomically incongruent one. We found in two independent experiments that a rubber hand rotated by 180° leads to increased proprioceptive drift during synchronous visuo-tactile stroking, although it does not lead to feelings of ownership (as measured by questionnaire). This dissociation between drift and ownership suggests that proprioceptive drift is not necessarily a valid proxy for the illusion when using hands rotated by 180°.

Citations in the library

Explore topics