Imitation Is Far More Than the Sincerest of Flattery: The Mimetic Power of Spirit Possession in Rajasthan, India
Jeffrey G. Snodgrass
February 1, 2002 DOI: 10.1525/can.2002.17.1.32 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Ethnography |
|---|---|
| Population | Rajasthanis in and around Udaipur, India, with whom the author spoke during ethnographic fieldwork |
| Key findings | The author argues that Rajasthanis unanimously condemned India's 1998 nuclear tests as dangerous yet simultaneously deemed them necessary for survival against surrounding nuclear-armed states, and he draws a parallel between this logic of imitating dangerous enemies and the spirit possession he was studying, in which Rajasthanis are possessed by both benevolent and malevolent entities, with possession typically construed as undesirable. |
Abstract
On May 11 and 13, 1998, India tested a series of nuclear devices in the desert state of Rajasthan. On May 28, Pakistan completed similar trials. During these tests I was researching spirit possession in Rajasthan in the town of Udaipur just to the east and south of the blasts. The trials, though not of direct concern to my research, were hard to ignore. Everyone was eager to discuss them with me as an American and thus a representative of the nuclear power. Virtually all Rajasthanis with whom I spoke saw these tests as dangerous and wrong. They feared the tests might lead to nuclear war with Pakistan and perhaps to the destruction of the world. Although the tests were unanimously condemned, they were, just as univocally, deemed necessary. India,' I was told, was surrounded by nuclear and soon-to-be nuclear states who longed for her land and resourcesnot only Pakistan, but China and Russia as well. Threatened with invasion, she needed to imitate the technologies and weapons of her enemies-especially the dangerous ones-if she were to survive. Meanwhile, in my formal research during this period, I was learning that Rajasthanis are possessed by a range of spiritual entities. Some of these are judged good and beneficial: spirits of murdered royalty, a god of the underworld referred to as Bhaironji, and deceased Muslim saints. Others are regarded as evil and malevolent: perpetual debtors who die perpetual debtors, stillborn babies whose mounts (ghorala, related to the Hindi term for horse) open and close their mouths in a sucking motion like a breast-feeding child, deceased widows (considered sexually voracious or "hungry" entities who lust after the bodies of newlyweds), and foreign tourists (particularly those who have committed suicide far from home and wander the grounds of Rajasthan's palace hotels).2 Possession by a spirit, even by those who are considered good, is typically construed as undesirable. The loss of control of one's senses that
Citations in the library
Cites 3
- Spirit Possession Revisited: Beyond Instrumentality Annual Review of Anthropology October 1, 1994
- Korean Shamans and the Spirits of Capitalism American Anthropologist September 1, 1996
- The Sakalava Poiesis of History: Realizing the Past Through Spirit Possession in Madagascar American Ethnologist May 1, 1998