Skip to content

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Mindful Eating Scale in Chinese adults: a translation and validation study.

Wenguang Xie, Qian Huang, Jian Kang, Wenhao Zhang, Yidan Liu, Ping Zhou, Chao Zhang

Frontiers in Public Health September 9, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1895623 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-cultural translation and psychometric validation study Peer reviewed
Sample size 346
Population Adults from three communities in Jiangxi Province, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, and Heilongjiang Province, China
Measures Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, I-CVI, S-CVI, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Reproducibility of results Feeding behavior Psychometrics Translating Translations Middle aged China Female Young adult Surveys and questionnaires Scale Nutrition Validity Reliability Mindful eating
Key points The Chinese version of the Mind-Eat Scale showed satisfactory psychometric properties, with a 24-item, six-dimension structure, overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.927, split-half reliability of 0.895, and test-retest reliability of 0.862. The authors conclude it is a preliminary instrument for assessing mindful eating in Chinese adults, but call for further validation in more diverse and clinical populations.

Abstract

Background: Mindful eating serves as a critical behavioral strategy for promoting healthy dietary practices and enhancing mental wellbeing. However, there is currently a notable absence of a rigorously validated mindful eating assessment tool that is applicable to the general population in China. This study aims to translate the Mindful Eating Scale (Mind-Eat Scale) into Chinese and to validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version within the general population of China.

Methods: A convenience sampling method was employed to recruit a total of 346 adults from three communities across three provinces in China: Jiangxi Province, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, and Heilongjiang Province. The Brislin translation model was employed for forward-backward translation. A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 7) conducted cross-cultural adaptation using the Delphi method, followed by a pilot test among 20 adults to confirm item clarity and comprehensibility. The reliability of the scale was assessed through internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. The validity of the scale was evaluated through both content validity and structural validity.

Results: The Chinese version of the mind-eat scale comprises six dimensions: awareness, non-reactivity, openness, gratitude, non-judgment, and hunger/satiety, totaling 24 items. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient for the scale was 0.927, with coefficients for the six dimensions ranging from 0.757 to 0.864. The split-half reliability was found to be 0.895, while the test-retest reliability was 0.862. Regarding content validity, the I-CVI values ranged from 0.857 to 1.000, and the S-CVI was 0.964. Exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, accounting for a cumulative variance explained rate of 69.135%. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good model fit with χ2/df = 2.273, RMSEA = 0.078, CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.908, IFI = 0.906, and PNFI = 0.706.

Conclusion: The Mind-Eat Scale exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties within a community-based convenience sample of Chinese adults, establishing it as a preliminary instrument for assessing mindful eating levels in this specific population. However, further validation in more diverse and clinical populations is warranted before broader application.

Citations in the library

Explore topics