Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Mindful Eating Scale in Chinese adults: a translation and validation study.
Wenguang Xie, Qian Huang, Jian Kang, Wenhao Zhang, Yidan Liu, Ping Zhou, Chao Zhang
Frontiers in Public Health September 9, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1895623 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Cross-cultural translation and psychometric validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 346 |
| Population | Adults from three communities in Jiangxi Province, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, and Heilongjiang Province, China |
| Measures | Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, I-CVI, S-CVI, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Humans Reproducibility of results Feeding behavior Psychometrics Translating Translations Middle aged China Female Young adult Surveys and questionnaires Scale Nutrition Validity Reliability Mindful eating |
| Key points | The Chinese version of the Mind-Eat Scale showed satisfactory psychometric properties, with a 24-item, six-dimension structure, overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.927, split-half reliability of 0.895, and test-retest reliability of 0.862. The authors conclude it is a preliminary instrument for assessing mindful eating in Chinese adults, but call for further validation in more diverse and clinical populations. |
Abstract
Background: Mindful eating serves as a critical behavioral strategy for promoting healthy dietary practices and enhancing mental wellbeing. However, there is currently a notable absence of a rigorously validated mindful eating assessment tool that is applicable to the general population in China. This study aims to translate the Mindful Eating Scale (Mind-Eat Scale) into Chinese and to validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version within the general population of China.
Methods: A convenience sampling method was employed to recruit a total of 346 adults from three communities across three provinces in China: Jiangxi Province, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, and Heilongjiang Province. The Brislin translation model was employed for forward-backward translation. A multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 7) conducted cross-cultural adaptation using the Delphi method, followed by a pilot test among 20 adults to confirm item clarity and comprehensibility. The reliability of the scale was assessed through internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. The validity of the scale was evaluated through both content validity and structural validity.
Results: The Chinese version of the mind-eat scale comprises six dimensions: awareness, non-reactivity, openness, gratitude, non-judgment, and hunger/satiety, totaling 24 items. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient for the scale was 0.927, with coefficients for the six dimensions ranging from 0.757 to 0.864. The split-half reliability was found to be 0.895, while the test-retest reliability was 0.862. Regarding content validity, the I-CVI values ranged from 0.857 to 1.000, and the S-CVI was 0.964. Exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, accounting for a cumulative variance explained rate of 69.135%. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good model fit with χ2/df = 2.273, RMSEA = 0.078, CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.908, IFI = 0.906, and PNFI = 0.706.
Conclusion: The Mind-Eat Scale exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties within a community-based convenience sample of Chinese adults, establishing it as a preliminary instrument for assessing mindful eating levels in this specific population. However, further validation in more diverse and clinical populations is warranted before broader application.
Citations in the library
Cites 3
- The effects of an 8-week mindful eating intervention on anticipatory reward responses in striatum and midbrain Frontiers in Nutrition August 11, 2023
- Effect of mindfulness meditation on short-term weight loss and eating behaviors in overweight and obese adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine December 5, 2017
- A structured literature review on the role of mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating in changing eating behaviours: effectiveness and associated potential mechanisms Nutrition research reviews July 18, 2017