Human-Computer Co-Regulation: A Review of Biofeedback for Meditative Practice
Mengxi Liu, Danyang Peng, Sizhen Bian, Lala Shakti Swarup Ray, Yajun Cheng, Bo Zhou, Siyu Yuan, Kanyu Chen, Kai S. Kunze, Kouta Minamizawa, Paul Lukowicz
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies September 30, 2026 DOI: 10.1145/3831659 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key findings | The authors argue that the effectiveness of biofeedback for meditation depends on matching sensing modality to practice type: respiration and heart rate variability are most suitable for paced breathing and stress recovery, EEG for attention-oriented and experiential targets, and electrodermal activity mainly reflects arousal awareness rather than directly measuring meditation quality. They propose a co-regulation framework and design principles for future systems. |
Abstract
Biofeedback has been proposed to support meditation and mindfulness practices through wearables, mobile applications, VR/AR systems for decades, and other interactive devices. However, evidence of its effectiveness remains mixed and fragmented across existing research in psychophysiology and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). This work analyzes 39 studies published between 2015 and 2025 on real-time, user-facing biofeedback for contemplative practice. We first outline a taxonomy of biofeedback interfaces based on sensing modality, feedback channel, interaction context and temporal feedback characteristics, then we synthesize the existing study results on modality-practice fit, showing that the performance of each biofeedback sensing modality in meditative practice is closely related to the meditation practice type: Respiration and heart rate variability (HRV) are the most suitable modalities for paced breathing and stress recovery, and EEG is more appropriate for attention-oriented and experiential targets. Electrodermal activity (EDA) mainly reflects arousal awareness rather than directly measuring meditation quality. In addition, a review-informed co-regulation framework consisting of within-session physiological regulation, experiential mediation, and transfer support is proposed in this work. Finally, we summarize the main gaps in the existing literature and propose design principles for future systems.
Citations in the library
Cites 34
- How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action From a Conceptual and Neural Perspective Perspectives on Psychological Science October 14, 2011
- Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: potential for psychological interventions. Clinical Psychology Review July 26, 2011
- Interoception, contemplative practice, and health Frontiers in Psychology June 9, 2015
- A systematic review of the neurophysiology of mindfulness on EEG oscillations Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2015
- Mindfulness on-the-go: Effects of a mindfulness meditation app on work stress and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology May 3, 2018
and 29 more in the library