Skip to content

The Scientific Boundaries of Dreaming: From Neural Correlates and Subjective Realness to Functional Causality and Anomalous-Information Hypotheses / 梦的科学边界

Xinyue Huang

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) September 26, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22980187 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review
Topics Dreaming
Key findings Argues that existing evidence supports treating dreams as sleep-generated experiences with variable immersion and metacognition, but does not justify a single function for all dreams, faithful decoding of arbitrary dreams, or a channel to parallel worlds.

Abstract

Preprint (not peer-reviewed). Version 1.0. Literature checked to 2026-09-27. Critical review of dream science covering neural correlates, dream reports versus experience, lucid-dream communication, memory and creativity claims, a causal-identification argument, and anomalous-information / precognition hypotheses. Main claim: existing evidence supports treating dreams as sleep-generated experiences with variable immersion and metacognition, but does not justify a single function for all dreams, faithful decoding of arbitrary dreams, or a channel to parallel worlds. AI was used to assist literature retrieval, verification, and drafting. The author is responsible for the arguments and source judgments. 中文专论预印本,未经同行评议。作者亦署 Hyston Huang(黄欣悦)。项目:盗梦笔记。

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on dreaming, most cited first.

Explore topics