Skip to content

[The Philosophical Relevance of the Study of Schizophrenia. Methodological and Conceptual Issues].

Pablo López-silva

Revista Colombiana de psiquiatria 2014 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcp.2014.07.002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Complementariedad metodológica Esquizofrenia Fenomenología Methodological complementarity Psicopatología Psychopathology Schizophrenia
Key points Argues that philosophy of mind, phenomenology, and empirical psychiatry and psychopathology are methodologically complementary and should regulate their progress jointly to reach plausible conclusions about 'schizophrenia'. Contends that the symptom of thought insertion challenges the current phenomenological approach to the relationship between consciousness and self-awareness.

Abstract

The study of mental illness involves profound methodological and philosophical debates. This article explores the disciplinary complementarity, particularly, between philosophy of mind, phenomenology, and empirical studies in psychiatry and psychopathology in the context of the understanding of schizophrenia. After clarifying the possible role of these disciplines, it is explored the way in which a certain symptom of schizophrenia (thought insertion) challenges the current phenomenological approach to the relationship between consciousness and self-awareness. Finally, it is concluded that philosophy of mind, phenomenology, and empirical studies in psychiatry and psychopathology should, necessarily, regulate their progress jointly in order to reach plausible conclusions about what we call 'schizophrenia'.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics