Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis
Markus A Maier, Moritz C. Dechamps, Markus Pflitsch
Frontiers in Psychology March 21, 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00379 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Online experiment Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 12,571 |
| Population | Online participants |
| Citations | 18 |
| Key findings | Micro-psychokinesis did not exist in the data, with Bayesian analysis yielding strong evidence for the null hypothesis (BF01 = 10.07). The authors suggest a possible non-random oscillatory structure in the temporal change of the effect, with a higher frequency than in simulated data, and discuss this in relation to entropy and von Lucadou's (2015) model of pragmatic information. |
Abstract
Intentional effects of human observerson the output of quantum-based random number generators (tRNG) have been studied for decades now. This research has been known as micro-psychokinesis (micro-PK) and many studies in the field reported evidence for mentally induced non-random deviations from chance. A most recent meta-analysis from Bösch, et al. (2006) revealed a very small and heterogeneous overall effect size that indicated a significant deviation from chance across studies. There remains doubt among the scientific community on the existence of micro-PK given: (i) the small and heterogenous effect; and (ii) the fact that several independent replication attempts of prominent studies failed to confirm the original results. The study presented here was intended to provide decisive evidence for or against the existence of micro-PK. An online experiment with 12,571 participants was conducted. The Bayesian analysis revealed strong evidence for H0 (BF01= 10.07). Thus, micro-PK did not exist in the data. A closer inspection of the temporal change of the effect seemed to suggest a non-random oscillative structure with a higher frequency than observed in simulated data. The possible role of entropy and the relation to the model of pragmatic information from von Lucadou (2015) is discussed.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus Frontiers in Psychology September 18, 2020
- A preregistered multi-lab replication of Maier et al. (2014, Exp. 4) testing retroactive avoidance. PLoS One August 31, 2020
- False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol. Frontiers in Psychology 2019
Cites 3
- How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2012
- Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology February 28, 2011
- Reexamining psychokinesis: comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006). Psychological Bulletin July 1, 2006