JavaScript is disabled in your browser. You can still read and search, but features like search previews, menus, and forms may not work until it's enabled.

Reexamining psychokinesis: comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006).

Psychol Bull July 1, 2006 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.529 (opens in new tab)

Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract

Characteristics	Commentary Peer reviewed
Key points	Argues that the meta-analysis by Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006) contains methodological flaws that undermine its conclusion that psychokinesis effects are not supported, and proposes that a corrected analysis leaves the question open.

Abstract

Reexamining psychokinesis: comment on Bösch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006).

Minding the Matter of Psychokinesis: A Review of Proof- and Process-Oriented Experimental Findings Related to Mental Influence on Random Number Generators Journal of Scientific Exploration January 15, 2022 12 citations
Reimagining the poltergeist in twentieth-century America and Britain cIRcle (University of British Columbia) 2016 2 citations
Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus Frontiers in Psychology September 18, 2020 38 citations
Two Replication Studies of a Time-Reversed (Psi) Priming Task and the Role of Expectancy in Reaction Times Journal of Scientific Exploration March 8, 2021 11 citations
Psychoactive Substances and Paranormal Phenomena: A Comprehensive Review International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 2012 35 citations