Skip to content

Nightmares in United States Military Personnel With Sleep Disturbances.

Jennifer L Creamer, Matthew S. Brock, Panagiotis Matsangas, Vida Motamedi, Vincent Mysliwiec

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine March 15, 2018 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.6990 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective review Peer reviewed
Sample size 500
Population Active duty United States military personnel with sleep disturbances who underwent sleep medicine evaluation and polysomnography
Measures Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-Addendum
Topics Anxiety Depression Dreaming
Keywords Humans Polysomnography Prevalence Retrospective studies Dreams Stress disorders, post-traumatic Adult Military personnel United states Female Surveys and questionnaires Sleep wake disorders Sleep disorders Insomnia Obstructive sleep apnea Nightmares Posttraumatic stress disorder
Key findings At least weekly nightmares were present in 31.2% of military personnel with sleep disturbances, though only 3.9% cited nightmares as a reason for evaluation; 60% of those with nightmares had trauma-related nightmares. Nightmares were associated with longer sleep onset and REM sleep latency and with higher relative risks of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and insomnia.

Abstract

Study

Objectives: Sleep disturbances are common in United States military personnel. Despite their exposure to combat and trauma, little is known about nightmares in this population. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence and associated clinical and polysomnographic characteristics of nightmares in United States military personnel with sleep disturbances.

Methods: Retrospective review of 500 active duty United States military personnel who underwent a sleep medicine evaluation and polysomnography at our sleep center. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-Addendum were used to characterize clinically significant nightmares. Subjective and objective sleep attributes were compared between groups.

Results: At least weekly nightmares were present in 31.2%; yet, only 3.9% reported nightmares as a reason for evaluation. Trauma-related nightmares occurred in 60% of those patients with nightmares. Patients with nightmares had increased sleep onset latency (SOL) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency (mean SOL/REM sleep latency 16.6/145 minutes, P = .02 and P = .01 respectively) compared to those without (mean SOL/REM sleep latency 12.5/126 minutes). The comorbid disorders of depression (P ≤ .01, relative risk [RR] 3.55 [95% CI, 2.52-4.98]), anxiety (P ≤ .01, RR 2.57 [95% CI, 1.93-3.44]), posttraumatic stress disorder (P ≤ .01, RR 5.11 [95% CI, 3.43-7.62]), and insomnia (P ≤ .01, RR 1.59 [95% CI, 1.42-1.79]) were all associated with nightmares.

Conclusions: Clinically significant nightmares are highly prevalent in United States military personnel with sleep disturbances. Nightmares are associated with both subjective and objective sleep disturbances and are frequently comorbid with other sleep and mental health disorders. Commentary: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 303.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... 2009 Observational study n = 6
Nightmare Prevalence, Nightmare Distress, and Self-Reported Psychological Disturbance Young adults with a mean age of 20 years 2002 Prospective observational study n = 116
Long-term effects of extreme situational stress on sleep and dreaming Survivors of traumatic events who complained of sleep disturbances, compared with... 1987 Case-control study n = 11
The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well‐being Adults who reported dreams 2004 Observational cohort n = 147
Dreaming in NREM Sleep: A High-Density EEG Study of Slow Waves and Spindles Healthy human subjects 2018 Observational cohort n = 14

Citations in the library

Explore topics