Dispatching the wandering mind? Toward a laboratory method for cuing "spontaneous" off-task thought.
Jennifer C McVay, Michael J. Kane
Frontiers in Psychology September 3, 2013 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00570 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Go/no-go task |
| Duration | 48 h between sessions |
| Keywords | Attention Consciousness Mind wandering Goal priming Current concerns |
| Key findings | Priming subjects' personal concerns via task-embedded word triplets increased mind wandering rate by about 3-4% compared to control triplets. The authors argue that this small effect is a promising development toward an experimentally informed, theory-driven science of mind wandering. |
Abstract
Cognitive psychologists and neuroscientists study most phenomena of attention by measuring subjects' overt responses to discrete environmental stimuli that can be manipulated to test competing theories. The mind wandering experience, however, cannot be locally instigated by cleverly engineered stimuli. Investigators must therefore rely on correlational and observational methods to understand subjects' flow of thought, which is only occasionally and indirectly monitored. In an effort toward changing this state of affairs, we present four experiments that develop a method for inducing mind wandering episodes-on demand-in response to task-embedded cues. In an initial laboratory session, subjects described their personal goals and concerns across several life domains (amid some filler questionnaires). In a second session, 48 h later, subjects completed a go/no-go task in which they responded to the perceptual features of words; unbeknownst to subjects, some stimulus words were presented in triplets to represent the personal concerns they had described in session 1. Thought probes appearing shortly after these personal-goal triplets indicated that, compared to control triplets, priming subjects' concerns increased mind wandering rate by about 3-4%. We argue that this small effect is, nonetheless, a promising development toward the pursuit of an experimentally informed, theory-driven science of mind wandering.
Citations in the library
Cited by 2
- The myth of cognitive agency: subpersonal thinking as a cyclically recurring loss of mental autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology 2013
- Targeted dream incubation at a distance: the development of a remote and sensor-free tool for incubating hypnagogic dreams and mind-wandering Frontiers in Sleep May 28, 2024
Cites 6
- Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 26, 2009
- Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013
- Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin March 1, 2010
- Incorporation of concern- and nonconcern-related verbal stimuli into dream content. Journal of Abnormal Psychology February 1, 1981
- Mind-wandering: phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Acta Psychologica February 23, 2011
and 1 more in the library